Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31912267›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2020

Comparison of different modalities for the diagnosis of parastomal hernia: a systematic review.

Gijs H J de Smet, Daniël P V Lambrichts, Sjoerd van den Hoek, Leonard F Kroese, Stefan Buettner, Anand G Menon, Gert-Jan Kleinrensink, Johan F Lange

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Stoma Complications.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Development and pilot testing of a patient-reported outcome measure to assess symptoms of parastomal hernia.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Assessment of a support garment in parastomal bulging from a patient perspective: a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Diagnostic methods in parastomal hernia; research and clinical relevance.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Parastomal gallbladder herniation: A case report and review of the literature.International journal of surgery case reports · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gijs H J de SmetDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. g.h.j.desmet@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8338-7439
Daniël P V LambrichtsDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4602-3115
Sjoerd van den HoekDepartment of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands.
Leonard F KroeseDepartment of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4702-5227
Stefan BuettnerDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Anand G MenonDepartment of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands.
Gert-Jan KleinrensinkDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Johan F LangeDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLIJsselland Ziekenhuis · NLReinier de Graaf Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeParastomal hernia (PSH) is a common complication following stoma formation. The incidence of PSH varies widely due to several factors including differences in diagnostic modality, observer, definition, and classification used for diagnosing PSH. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the modalities used to identify PSH.

methodsEmbase, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched. Studies reporting PSH incidence rates detected by two or more different diagnostic modalities or inter-observer variation on one diagnostic modality were included. Article selection and assessment of study quality were conducted independently by two researchers using Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. PROSPERO registration: CRD42018112732.

resultsTwenty-nine studies (n = 2514 patients) were included. Nineteen studies compared CT to clinical examination with relative difference in incidence rates ranging from 0.64 to 3.0 (n = 1369). Overall, 79% of studies found an increase in incidence rate when using CT. Disagreement between CT and clinical examination ranged between 0 and 37.3% with pooled inter-modality agreement Kappa value of 0.64 (95% CI 0.52-0.77). Four studies investigated the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography (n = 103). Compared with peroperative diagnosis, CT and ultrasonography both seemed accurate imaging modalities with a sensitivity of 83%.

conclusionCT is an accurate diagnostic modality for PSH diagnosis and increases PSH detection rates, as compared with clinical examination. Studies that specially focus on the diagnostic accuracy are needed and should aim to take patient-reported outcomes into account. A detailed description of the diagnostic approach, modality, definition, and involved observers is prerequisite for future PSH research.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHernia, AbdominalHumansIncidenceIncisional HerniaMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsSurgical StomasClassificationDefinitionDiagnosisHerniaModalityParastomal

Identifiers

PMID31912267
OpenAlexW2999197701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.