ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2020
Cerebrovascular haemodynamics during isometric resistance exercise with and without the Valsalva manoeuvre.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resistance exercise with combined Valsalva manoeuvre acutely increases carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in healthy untrained individuals.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- No difference in mean middle cerebral artery blood velocity responses between lower- and upper-body unilateral resistance exercise in untrained individuals.Experimental physiology · 2025Article
- Larger reductions in blood pressure during post-exercise standing, but not middle cerebral artery blood velocity, in resistance-trained versus untrained individuals.Experimental physiology · 2025Article
- Exercise-mediated cerebrovascular repair in Alzheimer's disease: from pathophysiology to therapeutic precision.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Review
- The effects of habitual resistance exercise training on cerebrovascular responses to lower body dynamic resistance exercise: A cross-sectional study.Experimental physiology · 2024Article
- Resistance exercise acutely elevates dynamic cerebral autoregulation gain.Physiological reports · 2023Article
- Effect of breath-hold on the responses of arterial blood pressure and cerebral blood velocity to isometric exercise.European journal of applied physiology · 2022Article
- The Acute Cardiorespiratory and Cerebrovascular Response to Resistance Exercise.Sports medicine - open · 2021Review
- Combined effect of heart rate responses and the anti-G straining manoeuvre effectiveness on G tolerance in a human centrifuge.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Cerebral vs. Cardiovascular Responses to Exercise in Type 2 Diabetic Patients.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Review
- Morphology of the Veins in Healthy Individuals in the Area of the Saphenofemoral Junction during Normal Breathing, Valsalva Maneuver, and Ujjayi Breath.International journal of yogaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo examine the interactive effects of VM and isometric resistance exercise on cerebral haemodynamics.
methodsEleven healthy participants (mean ± SD 28 ± 9 years; 2 females) completed 20-s bilateral isometric leg extension at 50% of maximal voluntary contraction with continued ventilation (RE), a 20-s VM at mouth pressure of 40 mmHg (VM), and a combination (RE + VM), in randomised order. Mean beat-to-beat blood velocity in the posterior (PCAv
resultsInteraction effects (VM phase × condition) were observed for MCAv
conclusionRE and RE + VM produce similar cerebrovascular responses despite different MAP profiles. However, the VM produced the greatest cerebrovascular challenge afterward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31912226What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.