SynthesisHNO2020
[Head and neck cancer in the elderly-current aspects].
Synthesis in HNO, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe treatment of head and neck cancer is dominated by surgery and radiochemotherapy, which is in part associated with high morbidity. In elderly patients, however, the otorhinolaryngologist often has to question the rationality of invasive treatment. Although the proportion of geriatric patients with head and neck tumors is increasing, the paucity of data means that there are few consistent standards and recommendations in the literature and guidelines.
objectiveThe aim of this paper is to provide concrete clinical recommendations for geriatric patients with head and neck tumors based on a systematic literature search. MATERIALS AND
methodsA keyword-based literature search was performed to present the current level of evidence and provide a clinical algorithm.
resultsIn addition to age, the pretreatment dispositional evaluation of geriatric patients should include psychosocial, functional, and medical (patient history) comorbidities. For pretreatment risk stratification, an algorithm was created on the basis of these data for individual evaluation of the patient's pretreatment risk.
conclusionPretreatment risk stratification of geriatric patients with head and neck malignancies is of high relevance for the individual decision for or against invasive treatment, but the currently available evidence is limited. This paper is based on a systematic literature review and provides a clinical algorithm for otorhinolaryngologists and head and neck surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.