Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31911842›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials research2020

Role of offset and gradient architectures of 3-D melt electrowritten scaffold on differentiation and mineralization of osteoblasts.

Naghmeh Abbasi, Saso Ivanovski, Karan Gulati, Robert M Love, Stephen Hamlet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Targeting Agents in Biomaterial-Mediated Bone Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Naghmeh Abbasi1School of Dentistry and Oral Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland 4215 Australia.
Saso Ivanovski3School of Dentistry, University of Queensland, Herston Campus, St Lucia, Queensland 4072 Australia.
Karan Gulati3School of Dentistry, University of Queensland, Herston Campus, St Lucia, Queensland 4072 Australia.
Robert M Love1School of Dentistry and Oral Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland 4215 Australia.
Stephen Hamlet1School of Dentistry and Oral Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland 4215 Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1283-3395

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCell-scaffold based therapies have the potential to offer an efficient osseous regenerative treatment and PCL has been commonly used as a scaffold, however its effectiveness is limited by poor cellular retention properties. This may be improved through a porous scaffold structure with efficient pore arrangement to increase cell entrapment. To facilitate this, melt electrowriting (MEW) has been developed as a technique able to fabricate cell-supporting scaffolds with precise micro pore sizes via predictable fibre deposition. The effect of the scaffold's architecture on cellular gene expression however has not been fully elucidated.

methodsThe design and fabrication of three different uniform pore structures (250, 500 and 750 μm), as well as two offset scaffolds with different layout of fibres (30 and 50%) and one complex scaffold with three gradient pore sizes of 250-500 - 750 μm, was performed by using MEW. Calcium phosphate modification was applied to enhance the PCL scaffold hydrophilicity and bone inductivity prior to seeding with osteoblasts which were then maintained in culture for up to 30 days. Over this time, osteoblast cell morphology, matrix mineralisation, osteogenic gene expression and collagen production were assessed.

resultsThe in vitro findings revealed that the gradient scaffold significantly increased alkaline phosphatase activity in the attached osteoblasts while matrix mineralization was higher in the 50% offset scaffolds. The expression of osteocalcin and osteopontin genes were also upregulated compared to other osteogenic genes following 30 days culture, particularly in offset and gradient scaffold structures. Immunostaining showed significant expression of osteocalcin in offset and gradient scaffold structures.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated that the heterogenous pore sizes in gradient and fibre offset PCL scaffolds prepared using MEW significantly improved the osteogenic potential of osteoblasts and hence may provide superior outcomes in bone regeneration applications.

Indexed as

Bone differentiationMelt electrowriting (MEW)Polycaprolactone (PCL)Pore sizeScaffold

Identifiers

PMID31911842
PMCPMC6942301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.