ArticleClinical sarcoma research2020
Toxicity management of regorafenib in patients with gastro-intestinal stromal tumour (GIST) in a tertiary cancer centre.
Article in Clinical sarcoma research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Emerging Targeted Therapeutic Strategies to Overcome Imatinib Resistance of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Article
- A Review of Bullous Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated with Anti-Cancer Therapy.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Regorafenib for the Treatment of Sarcoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022Review
- Systemic Therapy for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Current Standards and Emerging Challenges.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022Review
- The Role of Regorafenib in the Management of Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2022Review
- Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in Japanese patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors.International journal of clinical oncology · 2022Article
- Severe and delayed-onset acneiform eruptions as an adverse reaction to regorafenib.Dermatology reports · 2022Article
- Review
- Review
- An updated review of the treatment landscape for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Cancer · 2021Review
- Treatment of Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST): A Focus on Older Patients.Drugs & aging · 2021Review
- Optimal Avapritinib Treatment Strategies for Patients with Metastatic or Unresectable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.The oncologist · 2021Article
- Hepatic toxicity during regorafenib treatment in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRegorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor approved as third line treatment for metastatic GIST. Dose limiting toxicities are frequently seen and many patients require dose reductions. This study aimed to evaluate regorafenib toxicities and their management in a real-world GIST population.
methodsRetrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified 50 patients with GIST treated with regorafenib at our centre between March 2013 and September 2018.
resultsMedian progression free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months [interquartile range (IQR) 2.8-14.4 months]. Median overall survival (OS) from start of regorafenib to death or last follow up was 15.7 months (IQR 9.2-28.4 months). Baseline median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status on starting regorafenib was 1. The main reason for discontinuing regorafenib was progressive disease (PD) (31/50 [62%]) rather than toxicity (10/50 [20%]). Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were seen in 23/50 (46%) patients; palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) was most frequently seen (9/50 (18%)). Two patients died whilst on treatment with regorafenib from multi-organ failure secondary to sepsis (4%). Dose reductions were required in 19/50 patients (38%) and 8/50 (16%) patients started regorafenib at a lower dose band than the recommended dose (160 mg) due to comorbidities or concern over a higher individual risk of toxicity.
conclusionAlthough PD was the main reason for discontinuing treatment, toxicity management and dosing of regorafenib remains critical. Median duration of treatment was longer compared to previous studies suggesting a durable clinical benefit with regorafenib with rigorous toxicity management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.