Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31911828›Full record

ArticleClinical sarcoma research2020

Toxicity management of regorafenib in patients with gastro-intestinal stromal tumour (GIST) in a tertiary cancer centre.

Florence Chamberlain, Sheima Farag, Constance Williams-Sharkey, Cecilia Collingwood, Lucia Chen, Sonia Mansukhani, Bodil Engelmann, Omar Al-Muderis, Dharmisha Chauhan, Khin Thway and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical sarcoma research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Regorafenib for the Treatment of Sarcoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Florence Chamberlain1Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW6 3JJ UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7583-1341
Sheima Farag1Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW6 3JJ UK.
Constance Williams-Sharkey1Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW6 3JJ UK.
Cecilia Collingwood1Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW6 3JJ UK.
Lucia Chen1Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW6 3JJ UK.
Sonia Mansukhani1Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW6 3JJ UK.
Bodil Engelmann1Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW6 3JJ UK.
Omar Al-Muderis1Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW6 3JJ UK.
Dharmisha Chauhan1Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW6 3JJ UK.
Khin Thway1Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW6 3JJ UK.
Cyril Fisher2The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP UK.
Robin L Jones1Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW6 3JJ UK.
Spyridon Gennatas1Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW6 3JJ UK.
Charlotte Benson1Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW6 3JJ UK.
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor approved as third line treatment for metastatic GIST. Dose limiting toxicities are frequently seen and many patients require dose reductions. This study aimed to evaluate regorafenib toxicities and their management in a real-world GIST population.

methodsRetrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified 50 patients with GIST treated with regorafenib at our centre between March 2013 and September 2018.

resultsMedian progression free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months [interquartile range (IQR) 2.8-14.4 months]. Median overall survival (OS) from start of regorafenib to death or last follow up was 15.7 months (IQR 9.2-28.4 months). Baseline median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status on starting regorafenib was 1. The main reason for discontinuing regorafenib was progressive disease (PD) (31/50 [62%]) rather than toxicity (10/50 [20%]). Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were seen in 23/50 (46%) patients; palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) was most frequently seen (9/50 (18%)). Two patients died whilst on treatment with regorafenib from multi-organ failure secondary to sepsis (4%). Dose reductions were required in 19/50 patients (38%) and 8/50 (16%) patients started regorafenib at a lower dose band than the recommended dose (160 mg) due to comorbidities or concern over a higher individual risk of toxicity.

conclusionAlthough PD was the main reason for discontinuing treatment, toxicity management and dosing of regorafenib remains critical. Median duration of treatment was longer compared to previous studies suggesting a durable clinical benefit with regorafenib with rigorous toxicity management.

Indexed as

Gastro-intestinal stromal tumourRegorafenibSarcomaSoft tissue sarcomaToxicity management

Identifiers

PMID31911828
PMCPMC6942401
OpenAlexW3000098408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.