ArticleNature2020
Check for publication integrity before misconduct.
Article in Nature, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy and safety of oral ivermectin, topical permethrin, and combination in the treatment of patients with classic scabies: systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Pooled it
- Non-pharmacological and non-surgical treatments for low back pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Nirmatrelvir combined with ritonavir for preventing and treating COVID-19.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Vitamin D as an adjunct to antibiotics for the treatment of acute childhood pneumonia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Nirmatrelvir combined with ritonavir for preventing and treating COVID-19.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- What might a satisfactory response by journals and publishers to publication integrity concerns look like?Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026Review
- Can I trust this paper?Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Review
- Article
- Data-sharing and trustworthiness of trials evaluating cervical ripening in induction of labour: a meta-epidemiological study of randomised controlled trials.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Normal Weight Obesity Overview and Update: A narrative review.Current obesity reports · 2025Review
- How the National Library of Medicine should evolve in an era of artificial intelligence.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Investigating the impact of trial retractions on the healthcare evidence ecosystem (VITALITY Study I): retrospective cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- Exploring the Efficacy and Safety of Nutritional Supplements in Alzheimer's Disease.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Accuracy and distribution of baseline categorical variables andRoyal Society open science · 2025Article
- Publication integrity: what is it, why does it matter, how it is safeguarded and how could we do better?Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2025Review
- Body Composition and Alzheimer's Disease: A Holistic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Trustworthiness assessment of published clinical trials: Literature review of domains and questions.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2024Review
- Article
- Research Integrity in Guidelines and evIDence synthesis (RIGID): a framework for assessing research integrity in guideline development and evidence synthesis.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31911697What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.