Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31911646›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2020

Single-family room neonatal intensive care unit design: do patient outcomes actually change?

Susan E Puumala, Renae K Rich, Lonnie Roy, Regina Reynolds, Francesqca E Jimenez, Jackline G Opollo, Jeri Brittin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susan E PuumalaHDR, Inc, Omaha, NE, USA. susan.puumala@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6850-6855
Renae K RichHDR, Inc, Omaha, NE, USA.
Lonnie RoyParkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, TX, USA.
Regina ReynoldsParkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, TX, USA.
Francesqca E JimenezHDR, Inc, Omaha, NE, USA.
Jackline G OpolloParkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, TX, USA.
Jeri BrittinHDR, Inc, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1316-6451
Parkland Health & Hospital System · USUniversity of Nebraska at Omaha · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study examined outcomes in a single-family room neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) compared to an open bay within a public safety net hospital. STUDY

designWe included 9995 NICU encounters over 5 years pre and post move for a predominantly low SES population. Outcomes were length of stay (LOS), growth, time to first oral feeding, and incidence of sepsis. Analysis included regression models, interrupted time series, and growth models.

resultsLOS decreased over time in preterm infants both pre and post move, but increased post move for term/post-term infants (p < 0.001). First oral feeding decreased over time in both periods. A higher incidence of sepsis was found in the post period for term/post-term infants (p = 0.01).

conclusionOur analysis appropriately accounted for time trends. Few differences were observed. Changes in LOS for term/post-term infants should be further explored as well as the impact of NICU care patterns.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInterrupted Time Series AnalysisLength of Stay

Identifiers

PMID31911646
OpenAlexW3000222830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.