ArticleJournal of human hypertension2020
Effect of intensive and standard blood pressure control on cardiovascular outcomes based on body mass index: sub-analysis of the sprint trial.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modification of the effects of intensive systolic blood pressure control on kidney outcomes by baseline body mass index.Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2021Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study is a sub-analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) that aimed to evaluate the role of intensive vs. standard hypertensive treatment on cardiovascular outcomes according to the body mass indices of trial participants. SPRINT participants were categorized according to their baseline BMI values into normal (BMI ≥ 18.5 to <25), overweight (BMI ≥ 25 to <30), and obese (BMI ≥ 30) groups. The primary cardiovascular outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome not resulting in myocardial infarction, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure, or death from cardiovascular cause. Cox regression analysis was used to calculate hazard ratios for the study outcome in intensive and standard BP treatment among those with varying BMI. Among 9237 participants with, 1682, 3599, and 3956 were normal, overweight and obese, respectively. After a median follow-up of 3.26 years, the hazard ratios for the primary endpoint were 0.82 (95% CI 0.58, 1.16), 0.71 (95% CI 0.54, 0.94), and 0.76 (95% CI 0.59, 0.98) for the normal, overweight, and obese participants, respectively (P value for interaction 0.79). The effect of intensive versus standard SBP treatment for the other secondary endpoints and serious adverse events were all similar in participants of different BMI (all P-interaction > 0.05). In this sub-analysis of the SPRINT trial, intensive blood pressure control had a beneficial effect in reducing the primary endpoint and all-cause mortality irrespective of the participants' BMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.