Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31911522›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Value of an outpatient transition clinic for young people with inflammatory bowel disease: a mixed-methods evaluation.

Jane N T Sattoe, Mariëlle A C Peeters, Jannie Haitsma, AnneLoes van Staa, Victorien M Wolters, Johanna C Escher

Abstract readControlled Clinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Models of outpatient care delivery in inflammatory bowel disease: a scoping review.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  8. [Transition in gastroenterology and hepatology].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Marfan syndrome.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jane N T SattoeResearch Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0433-5022
Mariëlle A C PeetersResearch Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jannie HaitsmaResearch Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
AnneLoes van StaaResearch Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands vanstaa@eshpm.eur.nl.
Victorien M WoltersDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Johanna C EscherDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Erasmus Medical Centre - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDeveloping and evaluating effective transition interventions for young people (16-25 years) with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a high priority. While transition clinics (TCs) have been recommended, little is known about their operating structures and outcomes. This study aimed to gain insight into the value of a TC compared with direct handover care.

designControlled mixed-methods evaluation of process outcomes, clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes.

settingTwo outpatient IBD clinics in the Netherlands.

participantsData collection included: semistructured interviews with professionals (n=8), observations during consultations with young people (5×4 hours), medical chart reviews of patients transferred 2 to 4 years prior to data collection (n=56 in TC group; n=54 in control group) and patient questionnaires (n=14 in TC group; n=19 in control group). OUTCOMES: Data were collected on service structures and daily routines of the TC, experienced barriers, facilitators and benefits, healthcare use, clinical outcomes, self-management outcomes and experiences and satisfaction of young people with IBD.

resultsAt the TC, multidisciplinary team meetings and alignment of care between paediatric and adult care providers were standard practice. Non-medical topics received more attention during consultations with young people at the TC. Barriers experienced by professionals were time restrictions, planning difficulties, limited involvement of adult care providers and insufficient financial coverage. Facilitators experienced were high professional motivation and a high case load. Over the year before transfer, young people at the TC had more planned consultations (p=0.015, Cohen's d=0.47). They showed a positive trend in better transfer experiences and more satisfaction. Those in direct handover care more often experienced a relapse before transfer (p=0.003) and had more missed consultations (p=0.034, Cohen's d=-0.43) after transfer.

conclusionA TC offer opportunities to improve transitional care, but organisational and financial barriers need to be addressed before guidelines and consensus statements in healthcare policy and daily practice can be effectively implemented.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesMaleNetherlandsOutpatientsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresTransition to Adult CareYoung Adultadolescentsinflammatory bowel diseaseself-managementtransitional careyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID31911522
PMCPMC6955474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.