Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31911514›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Characterising and predicting persistent high-cost utilisers in healthcare: a retrospective cohort study in Singapore.

Sheryl Hui Xian Ng, Nabilah Rahman, Ian Yi Han Ang, Srinath Sridharan, Sravan Ramachandran, Debby Dan Wang, Astrid Khoo, Chuen Seng Tan, Mengling Feng, Sue-Anne Ee Shiow Toh and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Characteristics and Health Care Spending of Persistently and Transiently High-cost Older Adults in Korea.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sheryl Hui Xian NgSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-5046-2666
Nabilah RahmanSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-6513-2309
Ian Yi Han AngSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-1124-3764
Srinath SridharanSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-9754-4925
Sravan RamachandranSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Debby Dan WangSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-3755-8943
Astrid KhooRegional Health System Office, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Chuen Seng TanSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-6513-2309
Mengling FengSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Sue-Anne Ee Shiow TohRegional Health System Office, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-1570-4417
Xin Quan TanSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore kyletanxq@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe aim to characterise persistent high utilisers (PHUs) of healthcare services, and correspondingly, transient high utilisers (THUs) and non-high utilisers (non-HUs) for comparison, to facilitate stratifying HUs for targeted intervention. Subsequently we apply machine learning algorithms to predict which HUs will persist as PHUs, to inform future trials testing the effectiveness of interventions in reducing healthcare utilisation in PHUs. DESIGN AND

settingThis is a retrospective cohort study using administrative data from an Academic Medical Centre (AMC) in Singapore.

participantsPatients who had at least one inpatient admission to the AMC between 2005 and 2013 were included in this study. HUs incurred Singapore Dollar 8150 or more within a year. PHUs were defined as HUs for three consecutive years, while THUs were HUs for 1 or 2 years. Non-HUs did not incur high healthcare costs at any point during the study period. OUTCOME MEASURES: PHU status at the end of the third year was the outcome of interest. Socio-demographic profiles, clinical complexity and utilisation metrics of each group were reported. Area under curve (AUC) was used to identify the best model to predict persistence.

resultsPHUs were older and had higher comorbidity and mortality. Over the three observed years, PHUs' expenditure generally increased, while THUs and non-HUs' spending and inpatient utilisation decreased. The predictive model exhibited good performance during both internal (AUC: 83.2%, 95% CI: 82.2% to 84.2%) and external validation (AUC: 79.8%, 95% CI: 78.8% to 80.8%).

conclusionsThe HU population could be stratified into PHUs and THUs, with distinctly different utilisation trajectories. We developed a model that could predict at the end of 1 year, whether a patient in our population will continue to be a HU in the next 2 years. This knowledge would allow healthcare providers to target PHUs in our health system with interventions in a cost-effective manner.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdultAgedFemaleHealth Care CostsHealth ServicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareRetrospective StudiesSingaporehealthcare costshigh utilisermachine learningpersistence

Identifiers

PMID31911514
PMCPMC6955475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.