Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31911477›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2020

Differences in the Receipt of Low-Value Services Between Publicly and Privately Insured Children.

Kao-Ping Chua, Aaron L Schwartz, Anna Volerman, Rena M Conti, Elbert S Huang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Are radiographs overutilized in pediatric orthopaedic emergency room care?Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Pediatrics up to date-brief notes on research].Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Kinderheilkunde · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kao-Ping ChuaSusan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; chuak@med.umich.edu.
Aaron L SchwartzBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Anna VolermanSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine and.
Rena M ContiInstitute for Health System Innovation and Policy, Department of Markets, Public Policy, And Law, Questrom School of Business, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Elbert S HuangSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine and.
General Department of Preventive Medicine · VNBoston University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Research Design, Data, and Analytics CoreP30DK092949 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Arshiya Ahmed Baig · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
Using Default Opioid Prescription Settings to Limit Excessive Opioid Prescribing to Adolescents and Young AdultsK08DA048110 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHUA, KAO-PING · 2019 to 2023
$983k
Research and Mentorship in Medical Decision Making in DiabetesK24DK105340 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI HUANG, ELBERT S. · 2015 to 2019
$884k
NIDA NIH HHS K08 DA048110NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK105340NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren frequently receive low-value services that do not improve health, but it is unknown whether the receipt of these services differs between publicly and privately insured children.

methodsWe analyzed 2013-2014 Medicaid Analytic eXtract and IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters databases. Using 20 measures of low-value care (6 diagnostic testing measures, 5 imaging measures, and 9 prescription drug measures), we compared the proportion of publicly and privately insured children in 12 states who received low-value services at least once or twice in 2014; the proportion of publicly and privately insured children who received low-value diagnostic tests, imaging tests, and prescription drugs at least once; and the proportion of publicly and privately insured children eligible for each measure who received the service at least once.

resultsAmong 6 951 556 publicly insured children and 1 647 946 privately insured children, respectively, 11.0% and 8.9% received low-value services at least once, 3.9% and 2.8% received low-value services at least twice, 3.2% and 3.8% received low-value diagnostic tests at least once, 0.4% and 0.4% received low-value imaging tests at least once, and 8.4% and 5.5% received low-value prescription drug services at least once. Differences in the proportion of eligible children receiving each service were typically small (median difference among 20 measures, public minus private: +0.3 percentage points).

conclusionsIn 2014, 1 in 9 publicly insured and 1 in 11 privately insured children received low-value services. Differences between populations were modest overall, suggesting that wasteful care is not highly associated with payer type. Efforts to reduce this care should target all populations regardless of payer mix.

Indexed as

Value-Based Health InsuranceAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolChildren's Health Insurance ProgramCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInsurance Claim ReviewMaleMedicaidPrescription DrugsPrivate SectorPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID31911477
PMCPMC6993279
OpenAlexW3000119353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.