Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31911453›Full record

ArticleGenetics2020

Measuring

Siyu Serena Ding, Maksym Romenskyy, Karen S Sarkisyan, Andre E X Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. On collective behavior inFrontiers in neurorobotics · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Comparison of solitary and collective foraging strategies ofPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Siyu Serena DingInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8590-3908
Maksym RomenskyyDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2565-4994
Karen S SarkisyanInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5375-6341
Andre E X BrownInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom andre.brown@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1324-8764

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aric L Daul, Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N00065X/1Medical Research Council MC-A658-5QEA0Medical Research Council MC-A658-5TY30Medical Research Council MC_UP_1102/6Medical Research Council MC_UP_1605/9NIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For most animals, feeding includes two behaviors: foraging to find a food patch and food intake once a patch is found. The nematode

Indexed as

AnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsEatingEscherichia coliFeeding BehaviorMutant ProteinsMutationReceptors, Neuropeptide YReceptors, NicotinicCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsEat-2 protein, C elegansMutant ProteinsNPR-1 protein, C elegansReceptors, Neuropeptide YReceptors, NicotinicbioluminescenceCaenorhabditis elegansfeeding ratefood distributionforagingimaging

Identifiers

PMID31911453
PMCPMC7054024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.