ArticleAmerican heart journal2020
Rationale and design of the British Heart Foundation (BHF) Coronary Microvascular Function and CT Coronary Angiogram (CorCTCA) study.
Article in American heart journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
CORonary MICrovascular Angina (CorMicA): a Randomised, Controlled, Pilot Trial
Angina in Patients Without Obstructive Coronary Disease as Revealed by CT Coronary Angiography (Cor-CTCA): an Observational Cohort Study Involving Coronary Function Tests and a Nested Randomised Trial
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex associations and computed tomography coronary angiography-guided management in patients with stable chest pain.European heart journal · 2020Trial
- Exploring coronary microvascular dysfunction from functional impairment and structural damage.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Microvascular vasoregulatory dysfunction in African Americans - An enhanced opportunity for early prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024Article
- Great Debate: Computed tomography coronary angiography should be the initial diagnostic test in suspected angina.European heart journal · 2023Article
- Reappraising Ischemic Heart Disease in Women.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Latest from the WISE: Contributions to the Understanding of Ischemia and Heart Failure among Women with No Obstructive Coronary Arteries.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- What Is the Role of Assessing Ischemia to Optimize Therapy and Outcomes for Patients with Stable Angina and Non-obstructed Coronary Arteries?Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2022Review
- Non-obstructive Plaque and Treatment of INOCA: More to Be Learned.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2022Review
- Definition and epidemiology of coronary microvascular disease.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Review
- Review
- Syndrome of Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Diseases: A Comprehensive Overview of Open Artery Ischemia.The American journal of medicine · 2021Review
- Coronary Artery Disease in Women: A Comprehensive Appraisal.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Coronary vasospasm: A narrative review.World journal of cardiology · 2021Review
- Ten things to know about ten imaging studies: A preventive cardiology perspective ("ASPC top ten imaging").American journal of preventive cardiology · 2021Review
- Predictors of Microvascular Reperfusion After Myocardial Infarction.Current cardiology reports · 2021Review
- An EAPCI Expert Consensus Document on Ischaemia with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries in Collaboration with European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation Endorsed by Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021Article
- Article
- Assessment of Vascular Dysfunction in Patients Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Why, How, and When.JACC. Cardiovascular interventions · 2020Review
- Coronary microvascular disease: the next frontier for Cardiovascular Research.Cardiovascular research · 2020Article
- What is the Real Message of the ISCHEMIA Trial from a Clinician's Perspective?European cardiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Microvascular and/or vasospastic anginas are relevant causes of ischemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) in patients after computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA).
objectivesOur research has 2 objectives. The first is to undertake a diagnostic study, and the second is to undertake a nested, clinical trial of stratified medicine.
designA prospective, multicenter, randomized, blinded, sham-controlled trial of stratified medicine (NCT03477890) will be performed. All-comers referred for clinically indicated CTCA for investigation of suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) will be screened in 3 regional centers. Following informed consent, eligible patients with angina symptoms are enrolled before CTCA and remain eligible if CTCA excludes obstructive CAD. Diagnostic study: Invasive coronary angiography involving an interventional diagnostic procedure (IDP) to assess for disease endotypes: (1) angina due to obstructive CAD (fractional flow reserve ≤0.80); (2) microvascular angina (coronary flow reserve <2.0 and/or index of microvascular resistance >25); (3) microvascular angina due to small vessel spasm (acetylcholine); (4) vasospastic angina due to epicardial coronary spasm (acetylcholine); and (5) noncoronary etiology (normal coronary function). The IDP involves direct invasive measurements using a diagnostic coronary guidewire followed by provocation testing with intracoronary acetylcholine. The primary outcome of the diagnostic study is the reclassification of the initial CTCA diagnosis based on the IDP. Stratified medicine trial: Participants are immediately randomized 1:1 in the catheter laboratory to therapy stratified by endotype (intervention group) or not (control group). The primary outcome of the trial is the mean within-subject change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire score at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include safety, feasibility, diagnostic utility (impact on diagnosis and certainty), and clinical utility (impact on treatment and investigations). Health status assessments include quality of life, illness perception, anxiety-depression score, treatment satisfaction, and physical activity. Participants who are not randomized will enter a follow-up registry. Health and economic outcomes in the longer term will be assessed using electronic patient record linkage. VALUE: CorCTCA will prospectively characterize the prevalence of disease endotypes in INOCA and determine the clinical value of stratified medicine in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.