ArticleTranslational oncology2020
Hallmarks and Determinants of Oncogenic Translation Revealed by Ribosome Profiling in Models of Breast Cancer.
Article in Translational oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Translational resistance to amino acid starvation in breast cancer cells revealed by ribosome profiling.iScience · 2026Article
- Article
- Alternative splicing of transposable elements in human breast cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Review
- A comprehensive long-read isoform analysis platform and sequencing resource for breast cancer.Science advances · 2022Article
- Global translational landscape of the Candida albicans morphological transition.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- RSK1 and RSK2 modulate the translatome of glioblastoma cells in an isoform-specific and mTORC1 independent manner.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Gene expression is extensively and dynamically modulated at the level of translation. How cancer cells prioritize the translation of certain mRNAs over others from a pool of competing mRNAs remains an open question. Here, we analyze translation in cell line models of breast cancer and normal mammary tissue by ribosome profiling. We identify key recurrent themes of oncogenic translation: higher ribosome occupancy, greater variance of translational efficiencies, and preferential translation of transcriptional regulators and signaling proteins in malignant cells as compared with their nonmalignant counterpart. We survey for candidate RNA interacting proteins that could associate with the 5'untranslated regions of the transcripts preferentially translated in breast tumour cells. We identify SRSF1, a prototypic splicing factor, to have a pervasive direct and indirect impact on translation. In a representative estrogen receptor-positive and estrogen receptor-negative cell line, we find that protein synthesis relies heavily on SRSF1. SRSF1 is predominantly intranuclear. Under certain conditions, SRSF1 translocates from the nucleus to the cytoplasm where it associates with MYC and CDK1 mRNAs and upregulates their internal ribosome entry site-mediated translation. Our results point to a synergy between splicing and translation and unveil how certain RNA-binding proteins modulate the translational landscape in breast cancer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.