Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31911050›Full record

SynthesisJournal of biomechanics2020

Moment-rotation behavior of intervertebral joints in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation at all levels of the human spine: A structured review and meta-regression analysis.

Chaofei Zhang, Erin M Mannen, Hadley L Sis, Eileen S Cadel, Benjamin M Wong, Wenjun Wang, Bo Cheng, Elizabeth A Friis, Dennis E Anderson

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of biomechanics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Patterns of Load-to-Strength Ratios Along the Spine in a Population-Based Cohort to Evaluate the Contribution of Spinal Loading to Vertebral Fractures.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chaofei ZhangBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Erin M MannenUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Hadley L SisThe University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
Eileen S CadelThe University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
Benjamin M WongThe University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
Wenjun WangTsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Bo ChengTsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Elizabeth A FriisThe University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
Dennis E AndersonBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: danders7@bidmc.harvard.edu.

Funding

Age-related Changes in Thoracic Spine BiomechanicsR00AG042458 · NIA · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI ANDERSON, DENNIS · 2015 to 2017
$735k
Age-related Changes in Thoracic Spine BiomechanicsK99AG042458 · NIA · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI ANDERSON, DENNIS · 2013 to 2014
$179k
NIA NIH HHS K99 AG042458NIA NIH HHS R00 AG042458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal intervertebral joints are complex structures allowing motion in multiple directions, and many experimental studies have reported moment-rotation response. However, experimental methods, reporting of results, and levels of the spine tested vary widely, and a comprehensive assessment of moment-rotation response across all levels of the spine is lacking. This review aims to characterize moment-rotation response in a consistent manner for all levels of the human spine. A literature search was conducted in PubMed for moment versus rotation data from mechanical testing of intact human cadaveric intervertebral joint specimens in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. A total of 45 studies were included, providing data from testing of an estimated 1,648 intervertebral joints from 518 human cadavers. We used mixed-effects regression analysis to create 75 regression models of moment-rotation response (25 intervertebral joints × 3 directions). We found that a cubic polynomial model provides a good representation of the moment-rotation behavior of most intervertebral joints, and that compressive loading increases rotational stiffness throughout the spine in all directions. The results allow for the direct evaluation of intervertebral ranges of motion across the whole of the spine for given loading conditions. The random-effects outcomes, representing standard deviations of the model coefficients across the dataset, can aid understanding of normal variations in moment-rotation responses. Overall these results fill a large gap, providing the first realistic and comprehensive representations of moment-rotation behavior at all levels of the spine, with broad implications for surgical planning, medical device design, computational modeling, and understanding of spine biomechanics.

Indexed as

Mechanical PhenomenaRotationBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansJointsRegression AnalysisSpineCervical SpineFollower loadLumbar SpineMechanical TestingThoracic Spine

Identifiers

PMID31911050
PMCPMC7026905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.