Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31910911›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2020

In the aftermath of clozapine discontinuation: comparative effectiveness and safety of antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia who discontinue clozapine.

Jurjen J Luykx, Noraly Stam, Antti Tanskanen, Jari Tiihonen, Heidi Taipale

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Clozapine-induced diarrhea: A case report and mechanistic overview.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Mandatory certification for clozapine prescribing.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Jurjen J LuykxAssistant Professor, Departmentsof Psychiatry and Translational Neuroscience, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University; and Department of Outpatient Psychiatry, GGNet Mental Health, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6439-2774
Noraly StamResearcher, Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Antti TanskanenResearcher, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Eastern Finland, Niuvanniemi Hospital; and Public Health Solutions, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland.
Jari TiihonenProfessor, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Eastern Finland, Niuvanniemi Hospital, Finland; and Center for Psychiatric Research, Stockholm City Council, Sweden.
Heidi TaipaleAssistant Professor, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; Academy Research Fellow, Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Eastern Finland, Niuvanniemi Hospital; and Associate Professor, School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Finland.
University of Eastern Finland · FIUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough clozapine is often discontinued, there is a paucity of guidelines and evidence on treatment options after clozapine discontinuation. Moreover, it is currently unknown whether reinstating clozapine in patients formerly using clozapine should be avoided.

aimsTo compare the real-world effectiveness of antipsychotics after clozapine cessation.

methodFrom Finnish registry data (1995-2017), we identified 2250 patients with schizophrenia who had been using clozapine for ≥1 year before treatment cessation. The primary analysis consisted of adjusted within-individual analyses of psychiatric ward readmission owing to psychosis and treatment failure. Secondary analyses concerned between-individual mortality differences.

resultsCompared with no use of antipsychotics, risk of psychiatric ward readmission was lowest for reinitiation of clozapine (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.49; 95% CI 0.40-0.61; P < 0.0001), oral olanzapine (aHR 0.58; 95% CI 0.48-0.71; P < 0.0001) and antipsychotic polypharmacy (aHR 0.62; 95% CI 0.53-0.72; P < 0.0001). Risk of treatment failure was lowest for aripiprazole long acting injectable (aHR 0.42; 95% CI 0.27-0.65; P < 0.0001), reinitiation of clozapine (aHR 0.49; 95% CI 0.43-0.57; P < 0.0001) and oral olanzapine (aHR 0.69; 95% CI 0.61-0.77; P < 0.0001). Mortality risk was lowest for reinitiation of clozapine (aHR 0.18; 95% CI 0.09-0.36; P < 0.0001) and oral olanzapine (aHR 0.26; 95% CI 0.17-0.40; P < 0.0001).

conclusionsClozapine and olanzapine are the most effective and safest treatment options in those discontinuing clozapine for undefined reasons. Clozapine should therefore be reconsidered in patients with schizophrenia who previously discontinued this compound.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsClozapineSchizophreniaBenzodiazepinesFinlandHumansOlanzapineAntipsychotic AgentsBenzodiazepinesClozapineOlanzapineantipsychoticsclozapinediscontinuationpsychiatric ward readmissionSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID31910911
PMCPMC7511905
OpenAlexW2999744788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.