Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31910885›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

How to collect non-medical data in a pediatric trial: diaries or interviews.

Anaïs Le Jeannic, Hassani Maoulida, Sophie Guilmin-Crépon, Corinne Alberti, Nadia Tubiana-Rufi, Isabelle Durand-Zaleski

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00949221 (Evaluation of Long-term Efficacy of 2 Strategies of Real Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Compared to Self BG-monitoring in Children and Adolescent With Type 1 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00949221 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Evaluation of Long-term Efficacy of 2 Strategies of Real Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Compared to Self BG-monitoring in Children and Adolescent With Type 1 Diabetes: a Randomized, Multicenter, Open Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2009 to 2012Enrolled150ConditionsType 1 DiabetesArmsmonitor Paradigm 754 VEO, MINILINK Real Time, Medtronic, CE
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anaïs Le JeannicAP-HP, Groupe hospitalier Hôtel-Dieu, URC Economie de la Santé Ile de France, Paris, France. anais.lejeannic@urc-eco.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5982-1522
Hassani MaoulidaAP-HP, Groupe hospitalier Hôtel-Dieu, URC Economie de la Santé Ile de France, Paris, France.
Sophie Guilmin-CréponInserm, ECEVE UMR-S 1123, Paris, France.
Corinne AlbertiInserm, ECEVE UMR-S 1123, Paris, France.
Nadia Tubiana-RufiUniversité Paris Diderot, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Isabelle Durand-ZaleskiAP-HP, Groupe hospitalier Hôtel-Dieu, URC Economie de la Santé Ile de France, Paris, France.
Inserm · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRDélégation Paris 7 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-medical data, such as the amount of time that patients and caregivers spend managing their condition, may be relevant when assessing therapeutic strategies. For chronic pediatric conditions, the time that patients and caregivers spend in seeking and providing care (which are the indirect costs in an economic evaluation) can be significantly different depending on the treatment arm. To explore methods for collecting information on the care burden for caregivers and patients, we investigated whether a patient diary provided additional information compared to retrospective investigator-led interviews and whether a diary that was completed intermittently produced more or less information than a diary completed continually. The main objective of this study was to identify which type of data collection was most effective for measuring the time spent by caregivers and for estimating indirect treatment costs over 9 months.

methodsStart-In! is a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of three strategies of real-time continuous glucose monitoring for 12 months in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. We designed an ancillary study to assess methods of collecting information on the time spent by patients and caregivers in managing their condition (indirect costs). Data were entered retrospectively in case report forms (CRFs) by investigators during quarterly follow-up visits, which were supplemented with diaries completed prospectively by children or caregivers either continuously or intermittently. Data about absences from school and work as well as the time that caregivers spent on diabetes care were collected and the three collection methods were compared.

resultsAt the end of the 9-month study, 42% of the study participants failed to return their diary. For the diaries that were received, less than 10% of expected data were collected versus 82% during investigators'interviews. Based on all the information collected, we calculated that over 9 months, caregivers lost on average 3.9 days of working time (€786) and 4 days of personal time, i.e. the equivalent of €526, and spent around 15 min of time on care per day, i.e. the equivalent of €1700.

conclusionsThe CRFs completed by investigators during quarterly visits cannot be replaced by a diary. Completing the diaries appeared to represent an important additional burden to children and their caregivers, and the diaries provided little additional information compared to investigators' entries in the CRF.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00949221. Registered on 30 July 2009. Registry name: Study of Insulin Therapy Augmented by Real Time Sensor in Type 1 Children and Adolescents (START-IN!).

Indexed as

CaregiversDiaries as TopicInterviews as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolData CollectionDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMaleTime Factorsdata collectioninvestigator-led interviewpatient diarytime costs

Identifiers

PMID31910885
PMCPMC6947947
OpenAlexW3013303686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.