Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31910843›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2020

Validation of a competence-based assessment of medical students' performance in the physician's role.

Sarah Prediger, Kristina Schick, Fabian Fincke, Sophie Fürstenberg, Viktor Oubaid, Martina Kadmon, Pascal O Berberat, Sigrid Harendza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Scoping Review of Assessments in Undergraduate Medical Education: Implications for Residency Programs and Medical Schools.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarah PredigerIII. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Kristina SchickTUM Medical Education Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Fabian FinckeDepartment of Medical Education and Educational Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Sophie FürstenbergIII. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Viktor OubaidGerman Aerospace Center (DLR), Hamburg, Germany.
Martina KadmonFaculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Deanery, Augsburg, Germany.
Pascal O BerberatTUM Medical Education Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sigrid HarendzaIII. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. harendza@uke.de.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01PK1501A/B/C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessing competence of advanced undergraduate medical students based on performance in the clinical context is the ultimate, yet challenging goal for medical educators to provide constructive alignment between undergraduate medical training and professional work of physicians. Therefore, we designed and validated a performance-based 360-degree assessment for competences of advanced undergraduate medical students.

methodsThis study was conducted in three steps: 1) Ten facets of competence considered to be most important for beginning residents were determined by a ranking study with 102 internists and 100 surgeons. 2) Based on these facets of competence we developed a 360-degree assessment simulating a first day of residency. Advanced undergraduate medical students (year 5 and 6) participated in the physician's role. Additionally knowledge was assessed by a multiple-choice test. The assessment was performed twice (t

resultsOur assessment proved to be well operationalised to enable undergraduate medical students to show their competences in performance on the higher levels of Bloom's taxonomy. Its generalisability was underscored by its authenticity in respect of workplace reality and its underlying facets of competence relevant for beginning residents. The moderate concordance with facets of competence of the validated GAP-test provides arguments of convergent validity for our assessment. Since five aspects of Messick's validation approach could be defended, our competence-based 360-degree assessment format shows good arguments for its validity.

conclusionAccording to these validation arguments, our assessment instrument seems to be a good option to assess competence in advanced undergraduate medical students in a summative or formative way. Developments towards assessment of postgraduate medical trainees should be explored.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateInternship and ResidencyPhysician's RoleProfessional CompetenceSimulation TrainingAdultCognitionFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultArgument-based validationCompetence-based assessmentCompetencesPerformance-based assessmentPsychological assessmentSimulation

Identifiers

PMID31910843
PMCPMC6947905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.