Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31910811›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2020

Youth StepCare: a pilot study of an online screening and recommendations service for depression and anxiety among youth patients in general practice.

Belinda Louise Parker, Melinda Rose Achilles, Mirjana Subotic-Kerry, Bridianne O'Dea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Trying to carve nature at its joints: respecting the complexity of psychiatric diagnosis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Belinda Louise ParkerBlack Dog Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hospital Road, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia. belinda.parker@blackdog.org.au.ORCID 0000-0001-8856-1774
Melinda Rose AchillesBlack Dog Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hospital Road, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4246-3412
Mirjana Subotic-KerryBlack Dog Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hospital Road, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4821-182X
Bridianne O'DeaBlack Dog Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hospital Road, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1731-210X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral Practitioners (GPs) are ideally placed to identify and manage emerging mental illness in young people, however, many report low levels of confidence in doing so. A web-based universal screening service delivered via a mobile tablet, Youth StepCare, was developed to assist GPs in identifying depression and anxiety symptoms in youth patients. This service also provided evidence-based treatment recommendations and fortnightly monitoring of symptoms. The current study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of delivering the Youth StepCare service in Australian general practices.

methodsA 12-week uncontrolled trial was undertaken between August 2018 and January 2019 in two general practices in NSW, Australia. The service was offered to all youth patients aged 14 to 17 years who visited a participating GP during the screening period with their parent or guardian. Youth patients reported the presence of depressive and anxiety symptoms using the self-report Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-7. New cases were defined as those who reported symptoms but were not currently seeking help from their GP, nor had sought help in the past. Feasibility and acceptability among GPs and practice staff were assessed using a battery of questionnaires.

resultsFive GPs and 6 practice staff took part. A total of 46 youth patients were approached, 28 consented, and 19 completed the screener (67.9%). Nine reported symptoms of anxiety or depression, two of which were new cases (22.2%). GPs and practice staff were satisfied with the service, reporting that there was a need for the service and that they would use it again.

conclusionsThe Youth StepCare service appears to be a useful tool for identifying youth with unidentified symptoms of mental illness that can be easily embedded into general practice. Further research would benefit from exploring the factors affecting initial GP uptake and a larger trial is required to determine the efficacy of the service on young people's symptom reduction.

Indexed as

General PracticeInternet-Based InterventionAdolescentAnxietyAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical Decision-MakingDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDepressionEvidence-Based MedicineFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningNew South WalesPatient Health QuestionnaireMental healthPrimary careScreeningStepped careWeb-basedYouth

Identifiers

PMID31910811
PMCPMC6945483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.