Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31910797›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2020

Laryngeal mask versus facemask in the respiratory management during catheter ablation.

Takashi Koyama, Masanori Kobayashi, Tomohide Ichikawa, Yasushi Wakabayashi, Daiki Toma, Hidetoshi Abe

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takashi KoyamaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Matsumoto Kyoritsu Hospital, Habaue 9-26, Matsumoto, 390-8505, Japan. takashixkoyama@icloud.com.
Masanori KobayashiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Matsumoto Kyoritsu Hospital, Habaue 9-26, Matsumoto, 390-8505, Japan.
Tomohide IchikawaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Matsumoto Kyoritsu Hospital, Habaue 9-26, Matsumoto, 390-8505, Japan.
Yasushi WakabayashiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Matsumoto Kyoritsu Hospital, Habaue 9-26, Matsumoto, 390-8505, Japan.
Daiki TomaDepartment of Gasteroenterological Surgery, Matsumoto Kyoritsu Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan.
Hidetoshi AbeDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Matsumoto Kyoritsu Hospital, Habaue 9-26, Matsumoto, 390-8505, Japan.
Matsumoto City Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study is to investigate if a laryngeal mask could improve respiratory condition during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA).

methodsTwenty-four consecutive patients who underwent RFCA for atrial fibrillation were divided into two groups (Facemask group; n = 10, Laryngeal mask group; n = 14). All patients were completely sedated under intravenous anesthesia and fitted with artificial respirators during the RFCA. The capnography waveforms and their differential coefficients were analyzed to evaluate the changes of end-tidal CO

resultsDuring the RFCA, ETCO

conclusionsThe use of a laryngeal mask could stabilize respiration during intravenous anesthesia, which could improve the efficiency of RFCA.

Indexed as

Laryngeal MasksMasksAgedAtrial FibrillationCarbon DioxideCatheter AblationEchocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProcedural SedationRespiration, ArtificialCarbon DioxideCapnographyCatheter ablationETCO2Laryngeal mask

Identifiers

PMID31910797
PMCPMC6947869
OpenAlexW2999618733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.