Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31910438›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

An updated evaluation of serum sHER2, CA15.3, and CEA levels as biomarkers for the response of patients with metastatic breast cancer to trastuzumab-based therapies.

Alexandre Perrier, Pierre-Yves Boelle, Yves Chrétien, Joseph Gligorov, Jean-Pierre Lotz, Didier Brault, Eva Comperat, Guillaume Lefèvre, Mathieu Boissan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Involvement of FAM170B-AS1, hsa-miR-1202, and hsa-miR-146a-5p in breast cancer.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandre PerrierLaboratoire de Biochimie et Hormonologie, Hôpital Tenon, Groupe Hospitalier Est Parisien, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Pierre-Yves BoelleSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France.
Yves ChrétienCentre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Joseph GligorovService d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie APHP-Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Jean-Pierre LotzService d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie APHP-Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Didier BraultLaboratoire de Biochimie et Hormonologie, Hôpital Tenon, Groupe Hospitalier Est Parisien, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Eva ComperatDepartment of Pathology, Hôpital Tenon, Groupe Hospitalier Est Parisien, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Guillaume LefèvreLaboratoire de Biochimie et Hormonologie, Hôpital Tenon, Groupe Hospitalier Est Parisien, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Mathieu BoissanLaboratoire de Biochimie et Hormonologie, Hôpital Tenon, Groupe Hospitalier Est Parisien, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6494-5722
Sorbonne Université · FRInserm · FRInstitut Universitaire de France · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase HER2 is overexpressed in approximately 15% of breast tumors and correlates with poor clinical prognosis. Several treatments that target HER2 are approved for treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. The serum biomarkers most widely used to monitor anti-HER2 therapies in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer currently are CA15.3 and CEA. Nevertheless, their clinical utility in patients with breast cancer remains a subject of discussion and controversy; thus, additional markers may prove useful in monitoring the therapeutic responses of these patients. The extracellular domain of HER2 can be shed by proteolytic cleavage into the circulation and this shed form, sHER2, is reported to be augmented during metastasis of HER2-positive breast tumors. Here, we studied the clinical usefulness of sHER2, CA15.3, and CEA for monitoring treatment for breast cancer.

methodsWe measured prospectively pretreatment and post-treatment serum levels (day 1, 30, 60 and 90) of these three biomarkers in 47 HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab in combination with paclitaxel. Evaluation of the disease was performed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) at day 90.

resultsPatients with progressive disease at day 90 had smaller relative changes between day 1 and day 30 than those with complete, partial or stable responses at day 90: -9% versus -38% for sHER2 (P = 0.02), +23% versus -17% for CA15.3 (P = 0.005) and +29% versus -26% for CEA (P = 0.02). Patients with progressive disease at day 90 were less likely than the other patients to have a relative decrease of > 20% in their biomarker levels at day 30: 6% vs 33% for sHER2 (P = 0.03), 0% vs 27% for CA15.3 (P = 0.03), 4% vs 29% for CEA (P = 0.04). No patient with progressive disease at day 90 had > 20% reduction of the average combined biomarker levels at day 30 whereas 63% of the other patients had (P = 0.003). Moreover, when we analyzed a > 10% reduction of the average biomarker levels no patient with progressive disease at day 90 had a decrease > 10% at day 30 whereas 78% of other patients had (P<0.001, Se = 100%, Sp = 78%).

conclusionWe show that regular measurement of sHER2, CA15.3, and CEA levels is useful for predicting the therapeutic response and for monitoring HER2-targeted therapy in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. The average decrease of the three biomarkers with a threshold of > 10% appears to be the best parameter to distinguish patients who go on to have progressive disease from those who will have a complete, partial or stable response.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoembryonic AntigenDisease-Free SurvivalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiddle AgedMucin-1Neoplasm MetastasisTrastuzumabBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic AntigenERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesMUC1 protein, humanMucin-1Trastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID31910438
PMCPMC6946590
OpenAlexW3000224667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.