Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31910239›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Comparative study on skin protection activity of polyphenol-rich extract and polysaccharide-rich extract from Sargassum vachellianum.

Valentina Jesumani, Hong Du, Pengbing Pei, Muhammad Aslam, Nan Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The Potential of Algae in the Nutricosmetic Sector.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Marine drugs · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Valentina JesumaniGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, College of Sciences, Shantou University, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Hong DuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, College of Sciences, Shantou University, Shantou, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2247-3952
Pengbing PeiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, College of Sciences, Shantou University, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Muhammad AslamGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, College of Sciences, Shantou University, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Nan HuangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, College of Sciences, Shantou University, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Shantou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seaweed polyphenols and polysaccharide plays a broad range of biological activity. The objective of the present study was to study and compare the skin protection activity of fucoidan rich polysaccharide extract (SPS) and polyphenol-rich extract (SPP) from the seaweed Sargassum vachellianum. The skin protection activity was analyzed based on their ability to scavenge free radicals such as hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radicals, UV absorption potential, tyrosinase inhibition, moisture preservation, and antibacterial activity. From the results, both SPP and SPS protects the skin from UV damage. SPP showed good free radical scavenging ability, antimicrobial activity against E.coli and S. aureus and effectively absorbed the UVB and UVA rays whereas SPS hardly absorbs the UVA and UVB rays and showed weak free radical scavenging ability and no antimicrobial activity. SPS showed considerable inhibition on tyrosinase (51.21%) and had better moisture absorption (52.1%) and retention (63.24%) abilities than SPP. The results specified that both SPS and SPP have balancing potential on skin protection and suitable combinations of both could act as an active ingredient in cosmetics.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsAntioxidantsEscherichia coliFree RadicalsFree Radical ScavengersHumansHydrogen PeroxideHydroxyl RadicalMonophenol MonooxygenasePolyphenolsPolysaccharidesProtective AgentsSargassumSeaweedSkinSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredAnti-Infective AgentsAntioxidantsFree RadicalsFree Radical ScavengersHydrogen PeroxideHydroxyl RadicalMonophenol MonooxygenasePolyphenolsPolysaccharidesProtective Agents

Identifiers

PMID31910239
PMCPMC6946147
OpenAlexW2999163248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.