Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31910173›Full record

ArticleActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2019

Diabetes mellitus literacy in a regional community of a developed country.

Adelene Chen, Thelma Chidarikire, Drishti Sarswat, Cesidio Parissi, Ezekiel Uba Nwose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adelene Chen. adechen1995@gmail.com.
Thelma Chidarikire
Drishti Sarswat
Cesidio Parissi
Ezekiel Uba Nwose

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) is on the increase. Yet discrepancies exist in research reports regarding the level of knowledge of the disease in 'rural versus metropolitan communities', and 'developed versus developing countries'. This study examines the level of general knowledge of diabetes among adult community members of a regional city of Australia, whether it is comparable to reports from low-mid income countries.

methodsThe study was designed to be a cross-sectional day-time-population survey. Major shopping centres were chosen for convenience sampling of community's daytime population. A total of 315 participants' (154 males and 161 females) responses were received. Data were analysed using SPSS - 20 software to identify differences between sub-groups of age stratifications, educational status, gender and the participants assumed knowledgee. The participant's average knowledge of diabetes symptoms and complications were also assessed.

resultsThe major finding is that the subgroup who claimed to know 'very little' showed equivalent knowledge levels with those who thought they had 'considerable knowledge'. The females know more about diabetes management than males (P < 0.004); level of knowledge increased with educational status (p < 0.01). These observations were comparable with reports from developing countries.

conclusionsThe limited knowledge of diabetes symptoms and complications in the population can be mitigating against early reporting of patients to diabetes clinics in the community. To ensure continuous decline in prevalence rates of diabetes and its complications, the ongoing efforts of diabetes awareness and educational programs need to be improved, particularly with regard to males and school children. (www.actabiomedica.it).

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesDeveloped CountriesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUrban PopulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31910173
PMCPMC7233777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.