ArticleAnimal genetics2020
Genome-enable prediction for health traits using high-density SNP panel in US Holstein cattle.
Article in Animal genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detecting and characterizing copy number variation in a large commercial U.S. Holstein cattle population.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Genome-wide association and genomic prediction for a reproductive index summarizing fertility outcomes in U.S. Holsteins.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Combined effect of purulent vaginal discharge and anovulation on pregnancy status in a large multi-state population of Holstein cows.JDS communications · 2023Article
- Serum Vitamin D Is Associated with Antioxidant Potential in Peri-Parturient Cows.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Genomic Analysis, Progress and Future Perspectives in Dairy Cattle Selection: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Review
- Recent advances and future directions for uterine diseases diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management in dairy cows.Animal reproduction · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare accuracies of different Bayesian regression models in predicting molecular breeding values for health traits in Holstein cattle. The dataset was composed of 2505 records reporting the occurrence of retained fetal membranes (RFM), metritis (MET), mastitis (MAST), displaced abomasum (DA), lameness (LS), clinical endometritis (CE), respiratory disease (RD), dystocia (DYST) and subclinical ketosis (SCK) in Holstein cows, collected between 2012 and 2014 in 16 dairies located across the US. Cows were genotyped with the Illumina BovineHD (HD, 777K). The quality controls for SNP genotypes were HWE P-value of at least 1 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.