Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31909824›Full record

ArticleCancer2020

Factors associated with biomedical research participation within community-based samples across 3 National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers.

Nadine J Barrett, Elisa M Rodriguez, Ronaldo Iachan, Terry Hyslop, Kearston L Ingraham, Gem M Le, Kelly Martin, Rodney C Haring, Natalie A Rivadeneira, Deborah O Erwin and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Description and toolkit for a research participant referral service.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Impact of Clinical Trial Design on Recruitment of Racial and Ethnic Minorities.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Article
  9. How rural is All of Us? Comparing characteristics of rural participants in the National Institute of Health's All of Us Research Program to other national data sources.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The HealthStreet Cancer Survivor Cohort: a Community Registry for Cancer Research.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Inequities in Alliance Acute Leukemia Clinical Trial and Biobank Participation: Defining Targets for Intervention.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Cancer Epidemiology in Hispanic Populations: What Have We Learned and Where Do We Need to Make Progress?Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Nadine J BarrettDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-0439-5209
Elisa M RodriguezDepartment of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-1433-5816
Ronaldo IachanICF, Rockville, Maryland.
Terry HyslopDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Kearston L IngrahamDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-2842-0413
Gem M LeCenter for Vulnerable Populations, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Kelly MartinICF, Rockville, Maryland.
Rodney C HaringDepartment of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-5386-1205
Natalie A RivadeneiraCenter for Vulnerable Populations, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Deborah O ErwinDepartment of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Laura J FishDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Deirdre MiddletonICF, Rockville, Maryland.
Robert A HiattHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Steven R PatiernoDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Urmimala SarkarHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Elizabeth A Gage-BouchardDepartment of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.

Funding

Translational InformaticsP30CA082103 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Alan Ashworth · 1999 to 2026
$209.7M
Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Laura Fish · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI CANDACE S JOHNSON · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056NCI NIH HHS P30 CA082103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEngaging diverse populations in biomedical research, including biospecimen donation, remains a national challenge. This study examined factors associated with an invitation to participate in biomedical research, intent to participate in biomedical research in the future, and participation in biomedical research and biospecimen donation among a diverse, multilingual, community-based sample across 3 distinct geographic areas.

methodsThree National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers engaged in community partnerships to develop and implement population health assessments, reaching a convenience sample of 4343 participants spanning their respective catchment areas. Data harmonization, multiple imputation, and multivariable logistic modeling were used.

resultsAfrican Americans, Hispanic/Latinos, and other racial minority groups were more likely to be offered opportunities to participate in biomedical research compared to whites. Access to care, history of cancer, educational level, survey language, nativity, and rural residence also influenced opportunity, intent, and actual participation in biomedical research.

conclusionsTraditionally underserved racial and ethnic groups reported heightened opportunity and interest in participating in biomedical research. Well-established community partnerships and long-standing community engagement around biomedical research led to a diverse sample being reached at each site and may in part explain the current study findings. However, this study illustrates an ongoing need to establish trust and diversify biomedical research participation through innovative and tailored approaches. National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers have the potential to increase opportunities for diverse participation in biomedical research through community partnerships and engagement. Additional work remains to identify and address system-level and individual-level barriers to participation in both clinical trials and biospecimen donation for research.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityPatient ParticipationAdolescentAdultBiomedical ResearchCancer Care FacilitiesClinical Trials as TopicCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCooperative BehaviorEthnicityFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)biospecimen donationclinical trialscommunity engagementdisparitiesdiversity in research participationprevention

Identifiers

PMID31909824
PMCPMC7021578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.