Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31909740›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2020

Factors influencing estimates of coordinate error for molecular replacement.

Kaushik S Hatti, Airlie J McCoy, Robert D Oeffner, Massimo D Sammito, Randy J Read

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Scotty: lattice coincidences for macromolecular crystallographic phasing.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Putting AlphaFold models to work with phenix.process_predicted_model and ISOLDE.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Implications of AlphaFold2 for crystallographic phasing by molecular replacement.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaushik S HattiDepartment of Haematology, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.ORCID 0000-0002-6779-7283
Airlie J McCoyDepartment of Haematology, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
Robert D OeffnerDepartment of Haematology, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.ORCID 0000-0003-3107-2202
Massimo D SammitoDepartment of Haematology, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
Randy J ReadDepartment of Haematology, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.ORCID 0000-0001-8273-0047
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

PROJECT 5 - DUKE - STRUCTURE VALIDATION AND IMPROVEMENT FOR PROTEINS AND N. ACIDSP01GM063210 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI ADAMS, PAUL DAVID · 2001 to 2021
$33.5M
Horizon 2020 790122NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM063210NIH HHS P01GM063210Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 209407/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Good prior estimates of the effective root-mean-square deviation (r.m.s.d.) between the atomic coordinates of the model and the target optimize the signal in molecular replacement, thereby increasing the success rate in difficult cases. Previous studies using protein structures solved by X-ray crystallography as models showed that optimal error estimates (refined after structure solution) were correlated with the sequence identity between the model and target, and with the number of residues in the model. Here, this work has been extended to find additional correlations between parameters of the model and the target and hence improved prior estimates of the coordinate error. Using a graph database, a curated set of 6030 molecular-replacement calculations using models that had been solved by X-ray crystallography was analysed to consider about 120 model and target parameters. Improved estimates were achieved by replacing the sequence identity with the Gonnet score for sequence similarity, as well as by considering the resolution of the target structure and the MolProbity score of the model. This approach was extended by analysing 12 610 additional molecular-replacement calculations where the model was determined by NMR. The median r.m.s.d. between pairs of models in an ensemble was found to be correlated with the estimated r.m.s.d. to the target. For models solved by NMR, the overall coordinate error estimates were larger than for structures determined by X-ray crystallography, and were more highly correlated with the number of residues.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularProtein ConformationCrystallography, X-RayMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyProteinsProteinscoordinate errorLLGlog-likelihood gainmolecular replacementNMRr.m.s.d.root-mean-square deviation

Identifiers

PMID31909740
PMCPMC6939440
OpenAlexW2996012593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.