ArticleWater research X2020
Removal of bacterial and viral indicator organisms in full-scale aerobic granular sludge and conventional activated sludge systems.
Article in Water research X, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protozoan Communities and Their Contribution to Predation onEnvironmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Biological characterization and antibacterial effects of a novel virulentFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Comparison of activated sludge and virus interactions in aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactors.iScience · 2024Article
- Enterococci,Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Wastewater treatment plants, an "escape gate" for ESCAPE pathogens.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- (Antibiotic-Resistant)Environmental science & technology · 2022Article
- A critical review on the existing wastewater treatment methods in the COVID-19 era: What is the potential of advanced oxidation processes in combatting viral especially SARS-CoV-2?Journal of water process engineering · 2022Review
- Enhanced aerobic granular sludge formation by applying Phanerochaete chrysosporium pellets as induced nucleus.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2022Article
- Performance Efficiency of Conventional Treatment Plants and Constructed Wetlands towards Reduction of Antibiotic Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Persistence of surrogates for high consequence viral and bacterial pathogens in a pilot-scale activated sludge treatment system.PloS one · 2022Article
- Identification, antibiotic resistance, and virulence profiling of Aeromonas and Pseudomonas species from wastewater and surface water.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2021Article
- Temperature and Nutrient Limitations Decrease Transfer of Conjugative IncP-1 Plasmid pKJK5 to WildFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the novel aerobic granular sludge (AGS) wastewater treatment technology in removing faecal indicator organisms (FIOs) compared to the conventional activated sludge (CAS) treatment system. The work was carried out at two full-scale wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) in the Netherlands, Vroomshoop and Garmerwolde. Both treatment plants have a CAS and AGS system operated in parallel. The parallel treatment lines are provided with the same influent wastewater. The concentrations of the measured FIOs in the influent of the two WWTPs were comparable with reported literature values as follows: F-specific RNA bacteriophages at 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.