ArticleACS omega2019
Biorefining Process of Carbohydrate Feedstock (Agricultural Onion Waste) to Acetic Acid.
Article in ACS omega, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Waste to Green: Water-Based Extraction of Polyphenols from Onion Peel and Their Adsorption on Biochar from Grapevine Pruning Residues.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Liquid submerged fermentation by selected microbial strains for onion skins valorization and its effects on polyphenols.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2023Article
- Use of Vegetable Waste as a Culture Medium Ingredient Improves the Antimicrobial and Immunomodulatory Activities ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The biorefining of agricultural waste into green chemicals has clear potential for improving global environmental sustainability. In this study, we evaluated the potential of acetic acid production from carbohydrate feedstock (onion waste, OW) as a more environmentally friendly source than feedstock produced from natural gas. In particular, OW is an ideal feedstock for the biorefining process as it contains a sufficient amount of carbohydrates (69.7%). Five days of the simultaneous saccharification and two-step fermentation (SSTF) process produced acetic acid from OW more efficiently than the simultaneous saccharification and cofermentation (SSCF) process. SSTF produced 19.3 g/L acetic acid and recorded the highest conversion yield (90.5%) from OW (6% substrate loading, w/v). These results suggested that acetic acid can be efficiently and sustainably produced from OW by the SSTF process.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.