Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31909225›Full record

ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2019

Incidence of newborn resuscitative interventions at birth and short-term outcomes: a regional population-based study.

Peder Aleksander Bjorland, Knut Øymar, Hege Langli Ersdal, Siren Irene Rettedal

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06458582 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

High Flow Nasal Cannula is Appropriate Alternative for Stabilization of Very Premature Infants: a Prospective Observational Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharles University, Czech RepublicRan2021 to 2022Enrolled65ConditionsPremature, InfantArmsHigh-Flow Nasal Cannula
NCT06543589 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Randomised Trial Comparing of High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Cpap for Initial Respiratory Stabilisation of Very Premature Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharles University, Czech RepublicRan2024 to 2026Enrolled443ConditionsPremature, InfantArmsHigh-flow-nasal-cannula
NCT06683677 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

High Flow Nasal Cannula is Appropriate Alternative for Stabilization of Extremely Premature Infants: a Prospective Observational Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharles University, Czech RepublicRan2024 to 2029Enrolled60ConditionsPremature Infant, Ventilation Therapy, High Flow Nasal CanulaArmsHigh-Flow Nasal Cannula
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. RECOVER Guidelines: Newborn Resuscitation in Dogs and Cats. Clinical Guidelines.Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001) · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Effect of interface dead space on the time taken to achieve changes in set FiOArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Peder Aleksander BjorlandDepartment of Paediatrics, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6965-8263
Knut ØymarDepartment of Paediatrics, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Hege Langli ErsdalCritical Care and Anaesthesiology Research Group, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Siren Irene RettedalDepartment of Paediatrics, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Stavanger University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the incidence and characteristics of resuscitative interventions at different gestational ages and short-term outcomes after resuscitation. DESIGN SETTING AND PATIENTS: A prospective observational study in an unselected population at Stavanger University Hospital, Norway, from October 2016 until September 2017.

interventionsUsing a data collection form and video recordings, we registered and analysed resuscitative interventions.

main outcome measuresIncidence of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), positive pressure ventilation (PPV), intubation, chest compressions and intravenous fluid or epinephrine boluses. Short-term outcomes of resuscitated newborns.

resultsAll 4693 newborns in the study period were included in the study. Two hundred and ninety-one (6.2%) newborns received interventions in the first minutes of life beyond drying and stimulation. PPV was provided in 170 (3.6%) while CPAP (without PPV) was provided in 121 (2.6%) newborns. Duration of PPV was median (IQR) 106 s (54-221). Intubations were performed in 19 (0.4%) newborns, with a mean (SD) intubation time of 47 (21) s. Ten (0.2%) newborns received chest compressions and epinephrine was administrated in three (0.1%) newborns. Sixty-three per cent of the treated newborns from 34 weeks' gestational age were returned to parental care without further follow-up.

conclusionsThe need for resuscitative interventions after birth was frequent in this unselected population in a high-resource setting, but full cardiopulmonary resuscitation was rare. Short-term outcomes were good, suggesting that most newborns treated with resuscitative interventions were not severely affected.

Indexed as

asphyxiaincidencenewborn resuscitationshort term outcomesventilation

Identifiers

PMID31909225
PMCPMC6936999
OpenAlexW2998624672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.