Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31909219›Full record

ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2019

How are behavioural interventions delivered to children (5-11 years old): a systematic mapping review.

Amberly Brigden, Roxanne Morin Parslow, Catherine Linney, Nina Higson-Sweeney, Rebecca Read, Maria Loades, Anna Davies, Sarah Stoll, Lucy Beasant, Richard Morris and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Parental executive functions and motivations unveil variations in young children's screen media use.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Amberly BrigdenCentre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7958-7881
Roxanne Morin ParslowCentre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Catherine LinneyCentre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Nina Higson-SweeneyDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, UK.
Rebecca ReadDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, UK.
Maria LoadesCentre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Anna DaviesCentre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Sarah StollCentre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Lucy BeasantCentre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Richard MorrisBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Siyan YeCentre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Esther CrawleyCentre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2521-0747

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2016-09-021Department of Health DRF-2017-10-169Department of Health SRF-2013-06-013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextBehavioural interventions are used to prevent, manage and treat a wide variety of conditions including obesity, diabetes, chronic pain, asthma and emotional difficulties. There has been inadequate attention to the delivery of behavioural interventions to younger children (5-11 years old).

objectiveOur objectives were to describe the characteristics of behavioural interventions for children aged 5-11 years. DATA SOURCES: We searched five databases: CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library, from January 2005 to August 2019. STUDY SELECTION: The inclusion criteria were (1) children aged 5-11, (2) cognitive and/or behavioural interventions, (3) randomised controlled trials and (4) 2005 onward. Two researchers independently identified studies for inclusion. DATA EXTRACTION: Two researchers independently extracted data from eligible papers.

resultsThe search identified 10 541 papers. We extracted information on 117 interventions (from 152 papers). Many of the interventions were categorised as complex. This was particularly true for clinical populations; 78.7% were delivered to both the child and parent, and 33.9% took place across multiple settings, typically health and school settings. Most (70.9%) were 'First Wave' (behavioural) interventions, and few (4.3%) were 'Third Wave' (characterised by metacognition, acceptance and mindfulness). Thirty-nine per cent used interactive techniques (play, arts, story and/or games). Purely digital and paper-based interventions were rare, but around a third used these tools as supplements to face-face delivery. There were differences in interventions for younger (5-7 years) and older (8-11 years) children.

conclusionsInterventions designed and delivered to children should be developmentally sensitive. This review highlights characteristics of interventions delivered to children 5-11 years old: the involvement of the child's parent, using behavioural (rather than cognitive) modalities, using interactive techniques and some interventions were delivered across multiple settings.

Indexed as

child psychologycomm child healthgeneral paediatricshealth servicepaediatric practice

Identifiers

PMID31909219
PMCPMC6937047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.