Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31909193›Full record

ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2019

Comparing the needs and preferences of patients with moderate and severe dry eye symptoms across four countries.

Elisabeth Messmer, Colin Chan, Penny Asbell, Gary Johnson, Brigitte Sloesen, Nigel Cook

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Elisabeth MessmerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Colin ChanCentral Clinical School, University of Sydney Sydney Medical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Penny AsbellOphthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA.
Gary JohnsonInpharmation, High Wycombe, UK.
Brigitte SloesenGlobal Patient Access, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Nigel CookGlobal Patient Access, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8211-7613
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMundipharma (United Kingdom) · GBThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsUnderstanding patients' perspectives of their disease can inform drug development and treatment decisions. In this study, we compared the preferences and needs of patients with moderate and severe dry eye symptoms from four different countries.

methodsA quantitative questionnaire was developed based on the self-explicated conjoint methodology and was administered to 160 patients with moderate or severe dry eye disease (DED) from Australia, Germany, UK and the USA.

resultsPatients with moderate dry eye symptoms ranked 'treatment satisfaction' as the most important aspect, whereas 'symptom bother' was more relevant for those in the severe group. Both the moderate and severe groups classified treatment effectiveness as the most important treatment attribute. This result was consistent across the four countries, although US patients gave significantly higher scores than patients from other countries (p<0.001). Furthermore, patients from Australia ranked 'treatment experience' as significantly more important than the concern of side effects, whereas respondents from Germany exhibited the opposite trend (p<0.05 for both). The health burden of DED is reflected in the average European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions 5-level (EQ-5D) scores of 0.764 and 0.658 for patients with moderate and severe disease, respectively.

conclusionOur results confirm that across the countries in the study, moderate and severe DED has a major impact on patients' quality of life and daily activities. By providing insight into the patient perspective of DED, our study helps identify outcomes that are important to patients and may guide future drug development and clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

disease severitydrug developmentdry eye diseaseEQ-5Dpatient preference

Identifiers

PMID31909193
PMCPMC6936582
OpenAlexW2995470060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.