ArticleData in brief2020
Proteome dataset of mouse macrophage cell line infected with tick-borne encephalitis virus.
Article in Data in brief, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genotype-driven sensitivity of mice to tick-borne encephalitis virus correlates with differential host responses in peripheral macrophages and brain.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2025Article
- Plasma Proteomic Profile of Patients with Tick-Borne Encephalitis and Co-Infections.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Proteome Profiling of PMJ2-R and Primary Peritoneal Macrophages.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report the proteomic datasets on the mouse macrophage cell line PMJ2R infected with tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) for two and six days. Data were acquired using shotgun ultra-high resolution mass spectrometry. Peptide identifications were done using the Mascot version 2.4 (Matrix Science), and quantification was performed by a label-free approach. Protein profiles of early (two days) and late (six days) stages of infection were compared between each other and the respective control samples. Protein profiles of infected and control samples differed in the number of identified proteins and their relative abundances. Proteins detected in the TBEV-infected cells were involved in various processes related to the infection, including defense response against the virus, regulation of viral process, negative regulation of viral genome replication, RNA binding, or innate immune response. Also, proteins specific for the early and late stages of infection were identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.