Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31908934›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic translation2020

A novel calcium phosphate-based nanocomposite for the augmentation of cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screws fixation: A cadaver and biomechanical study.

Haolin Sun, Chun Liu, Xuwen Li, Huiling Liu, Weiguang Zhang, Huilin Yang, Chunde Li, Lei Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A comprehensive review of biomechanical factors influencing pedicle screw fixation strength and the critical role of artificial intelligence.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Haolin SunDepartment of Orthopedics, Peking University First Hospital, China.
Chun LiuInstitute of Orthopedics, Department of Orthopedics, Soochow University, China.
Xuwen LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Peking University First Hospital, China.
Huiling LiuInstitute of Orthopedics, Department of Orthopedics, Soochow University, China.
Weiguang ZhangDepartment of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, China.
Huilin YangInstitute of Orthopedics, Department of Orthopedics, Soochow University, China.
Chunde LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Peking University First Hospital, China.
Lei YangInstitute of Orthopedics, Department of Orthopedics, Soochow University, China.
Peking University · CNSoochow University · CNHebei University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectiveBoth polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and traditional calcium phosphate-based cements have some deficiencies as augmentation materials for pedicle screw fixation. Here, a novel calcium phosphate-based nanocomposite (CPN) for the augmentation of pedicle screw fixation was developed based on previous study, and the handling properties, biomechanical performance, and biodegradation behaviour of CPN were evaluated and compared with clinical PMMA by means of a cadaver study and animal tests.

methodsBone mineral density of the lumbar vertebrae was tested. Pedicle screws were placed into the lumbar vertebrae under the guidance of three dimensionally printed templates; each of which was designed based on computed tomography (CT) reconstruction of each vertebrae ​and augmented with either PMMA or CPN. X-ray and CT scan were used to evaluate the accuracy of screw placement and dispersion as well as interdigitation of bone cement. The axial pull-out strength and maximum torque were tested using a mechanical testing machine. Degradation behaviour of CPN was evaluated by in vitro immersion tests for 8 weeks and in vivo rabbit femur defect model for up to 6 months, respectively.

resultsStandard mechanical tests revealed that PMMA was much stronger than CPN after setting (compressive strength 95 vs. 49 ​MPa, respectively,

conclusionA new nanocomposite cement CPN, designed for replacing the nondegradable PMMA cement and overcoming the mechanical inferiority of calcium phosphate cement, was evaluated for its biomechanical and biodegradation behaviours in cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screws (CICPS) application. Although CPN is a mechanically weaker material than PMMA, CPN demonstrates similar biomechanical properties to PMMA in the application of augmentation for CICPS fixation in cadaveric vertebrae. This improvement in biomechanical property is attributed to a better dispersion and interdigitation mode of CPN. In addition, the animal study results suggest the in vivo absorption of CPN is slow enough and matches the bone ingrowth. THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE: This work reports a cadaveric and biomechanical study of novel CPN for the application in the augmentation of CICPS. The results suggest that CPN has equivalent or better biomechanical and interdigitation performance compared with PMMA. Together with the biodegradability and ossointegration capability, CPN reveals high translational potential as a new bone cements for load-bearing bone fixation and repair.

Indexed as

Calcium phosphate–based cementInjectableOsteoporosisPedicle screwPMMA

Identifiers

PMID31908934
PMCPMC6938802
OpenAlexW2971690752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.