Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31908924›Full record

ReviewMetabolic engineering communications2020

Modular engineering for microbial production of carotenoids.

Cheng Li, Charles A Swofford, Anthony J Sinskey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Metabolic engineering communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Characterization and Transcriptomic Analysis of AntarcticJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Carotenoid Yeasts and Their Application Potential.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. EngineeringBiodesign research · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Overproduction ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cheng LiDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA, 02139, USA.
Charles A SwoffordDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA, 02139, USA.
Anthony J SinskeyDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA, 02139, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an increasing demand for carotenoids due to their applications in the food, flavor, pharmaceutical and feed industries, however, the extraction and synthesis of these compounds can be expensive and technically challenging. Microbial production of carotenoids provides an attractive alternative to the negative environmental impacts and cost of chemical synthesis or direct extraction from plants. Metabolic engineering and synthetic biology approaches have been widely utilized to reconstruct and optimize pathways for carotenoid overproduction in microorganisms. This review summarizes the current advances in microbial engineering for carotenoid production and divides the carotenoid biosynthesis building blocks into four distinct metabolic modules: 1) central carbon metabolism, 2) cofactor metabolism, 3) isoprene supplement metabolism and 4) carotenoid biosynthesis. These four modules focus on redirecting carbon flux and optimizing cofactor supplements for isoprene precursors needed for carotenoid synthesis. Future perspectives are also discussed to provide insights into microbial engineering principles for overproduction of carotenoids.

Indexed as

CarotenoidsIsopentenol utilization pathwayMetabolic engineeringMevalonateModular engineeringSynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID31908924
PMCPMC6938962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.