Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31908870›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2019

The burden of misclassification of antepartum stillbirth in Nepal.

Rejina Gurung, Helena Litorp, Sara Berkelhamer, Hong Zhou, Bhim Singh Tinkari, Prajwal Paudel, Honey Malla, Srijana Sharma, Ashish Kc

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Rejina GurungResearch, Golden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Helena LitorpDepartment of Global Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sara BerkelhamerDepartment of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, United States.
Hong ZhouDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Peking University of Health Sciences, Peking, China.
Bhim Singh TinkariMinistry of Health and Population, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Prajwal PaudelMinistry of Health and Population, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Honey MallaResearch, Golden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Srijana SharmaResearch, Golden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Ashish KcDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0541-4486
Nepal Development Research Institute · NPMinistry of Health and Population · NPUppsala University · SEPeking University · CNUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, every year 1.1 million antepartum stillbirths occur with 98% of these deaths taking place in countries where the health system is poor. In this paper we examine the burden of misclassification of antepartum stillbirth in hospitals of Nepal and factors associated with misclassification.

methodA prospective observational study was conducted in 12 hospitals of Nepal for a period of 6 months. If fetal heart sounds (FHS) were detected at admission and during the intrapartum period, the antepartum stillbirth (fetal death ≥22 weeks prior labour) recorded in patient's case note was recategorised as misclassified antepartum stillbirth. We further compared sociodemographic, obstetric and neonatal characteristics of misclassified and correctly classified antepartum stillbirths using bivariate and multivariate analysis.

resultA total of 41 061 women were enrolled in the study and 39 562 of the participants' FHS were taken at admission. Of the total participants whose FHS were taken at admission, 94.8% had normal FHS, 4.7% had abnormal FHS and 0.6% had no FHS at admission. Of the total 119 recorded antepartum stillbirths, 29 (24.4%) had FHS at admission and during labour and therefore categorised as misclassified antepartum stillbirths. Multivariate analysis performed to adjust the risk of association revealed that complications during pregnancy resulted in a threefold risk of misclassification (adjusted OR-3.35, 95% CI 1.95 to 5.76).

conclusionAlmost 25% of the recorded antepartum stillbirths were misclassified. Improving quality of data is crucial to improving accountability and quality of care. As the interventions to reduce antepartum stillbirth differ, accurate measurement of antepartum stillbirth is critical. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN30829654.

Indexed as

epidemiologyhealth systemsmaternal healthpublic health

Identifiers

PMID31908870
PMCPMC6936383
OpenAlexW2995392189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.