Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31908868›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2019

Are inequities decreasing? Birth registration for children under five in low-income and middle-income countries, 1999-2016.

Amiya Bhatia, Nancy Krieger, Jason Beckfield, Aluisio J D Barros, Cesar Victora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amiya BhatiaDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8163-2568
Nancy KriegerDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4815-5947
Jason BeckfieldDepartment of Sociology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Aluisio J D BarrosInternational Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2022-8729
Cesar VictoraInternational Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2465-2180

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough global birth registration coverage has improved from 58% to 71% among children under five globally, inequities in birth registration coverage by wealth, urban/rural location, maternal education and access to a health facility persist. Few studies examine whether inequities in birth registration in low-income and middle-income countries have changed over time.

methodsWe combined information on caregiver reported birth registration of 1.6 million children in 173 publicly available, nationally representative Demographic Health Surveys and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys across 67 low-income and middle-income countries between 1999 and 2016. For each survey, we calculated point estimates and 95% CIs for the percentage of children under 5 years without birth registration on average and stratified by sex, urban/rural location and wealth. For each sociodemographic variable, we estimated absolute measures of inequality. We then examined changes in non-registration and inequities between surveys, and annually.

results14 out of 67 countries had achieved complete birth registration. Among the remaining 53 countries, 39 countries successfully decreased the percentage of children without birth registration. However, this reduction occurred alongside statistically significant increases in wealth inequities in 9 countries and statistically significant decreases in 10 countries. At the most recent survey, the percentage of children without birth registration was greater than 50% in 16 out of 67 countries.

conclusionAlthough birth registration improved on average, progress in reducing wealth inequities has been limited. Findings highlight the importance of monitoring changes in inequities to improve birth registration, to monitor Sustainable Development Goal 16.9 and to strengthen Civil Registration and Vital Statistics systems.

Indexed as

child healthdescriptive studyepidemiologypublic health

Identifiers

PMID31908868
PMCPMC6936526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.