Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31908867›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2019

'Never let a crisis go to waste': post-Ebola agenda-setting for health system strengthening in Guinea.

Delphin Kolie, Alexandre Delamou, Remco van de Pas, Nafissatou Dioubate, Patrice Bouedouno, Abdoul Habib Beavogui, Abdoulaye Kaba, Abdoulaye Misside Diallo, Willem Van De Put, Wim Van Damme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Delphin KolieResearch, Centre National de Formation et de Recherche en Santé Rurale de Maferinyah, Forécariah, Guinea.
Alexandre DelamouResearch, Centre National de Formation et de Recherche en Santé Rurale de Maferinyah, Forécariah, Guinea.
Remco van de PasDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Nafissatou DioubateResearch, Centre National de Formation et de Recherche en Santé Rurale de Maferinyah, Forécariah, Guinea.
Patrice BouedounoResearch, Centre National de Formation et de Recherche en Santé Rurale de Maferinyah, Forécariah, Guinea.
Abdoul Habib BeavoguiResearch, Centre National de Formation et de Recherche en Santé Rurale de Maferinyah, Forécariah, Guinea.
Abdoulaye KabaBureau de Stratégie et de Développement, Ministère de la Santé, Conakry, Guinea.
Abdoulaye Misside DialloBureau de Stratégie et de Développement, Ministère de la Santé, Conakry, Guinea.
Willem Van De PutDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Wim Van DammeDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGuinea is a country with a critical deficit and maldistribution of healthcare workers along with a high risk of epidemics' occurrence. However, actors in the health sector have missed opportunities for more than a decade to attract political attention. This article aims to explain why this situation exists and what were the roles of actors in the agenda-setting process of the post-Ebola health system strengthening programme. It also assesses threats and opportunities for this programme's sustainability.

methodsWe used Kingdon's agenda-setting methodological framework to explain why actors promptly focused on the health sector reform after the Ebola outbreak. We conducted a qualitative explanatory study using a literature review and key informant interviews.

resultsWe found that, in the problem stream, the Ebola epidemic caused considerable fear among national as well as international actors, a social crisis and an economic system failure. This social crisis was entertained by communities' suspicion of an 'Ebola-business'. In response to these problems, policy actors identified three sets of solutions: the temporary external funds generated by the Ebola response; the availability of experienced health workers in the Ebola control team; and the overproduction of health graduates in the labour market. We also found that the politics agenda was dominated by two major factors: the global health security agenda and the political and financial interests of national policy actors. Although the opening of the policy window has improved human resources, finance and logistics, and infrastructures pillars of the health system, it, however, disproportionally focuses on epidemic preparedness and response. and neglects patients' financial affordability of essential health services.

conclusionDomestic policy entrepreneurs must realise that agenda-setting of health issues in the Guinean context strongly depends on the construction of the problem definition and how this is influenced by international actors.

Indexed as

agenda-settingEbola outbreakglobal health securityGuineahealth system strengtheninghealth workforce

Identifiers

PMID31908867
PMCPMC6936556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.