ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2019
Does physician distraction lead to diagnostic and management errors? An exploratory study in the primary care setting.
Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Why don't we teach medical students to work in chaos?Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThere is an increasing concern about diagnostic errors and their impact on patient safety. Physicians' diagnostic ability is significantly undermined by certain distractions that can carry potential negative consequences such as diagnostic and management errors. This study aimed to examine the effects of distracting factors for physicians during consultation and their consequent effects on diagnostic accuracy and disease or condition management.
methodsFamily medicine residents at a major training hospital in KSA were randomly assigned to two groups of simulated patients: one group with patients with distracting features and another group with patients without distracting features (the control group). Both groups encountered six simulated patients with different clinical conditions or diseases. The consultation time, accuracy of diagnosis, appropriateness of management, number of outlines of treatment, and simulated patient satisfaction were measured for both groups.
resultsA total of 70 simulated physician-patient encounters were conducted with 35 residents. Consultation time was significantly longer for encounters with patients with distracting features, which had a mean time of 7.43 min, compared with encounters with non-distracting patients, which had a mean time of 4.4 min (
conclusionDistracting factors are associated with prolonged consultation time among physicians. Although this study did not demonstrate any effects of distracting factors on accuracy of diagnosis or disease management, these factors are still concerning, especially in complex clinical situations and situations where there is lack of reflective practice. The effects of distracting factors should be minimized to ensure patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.