Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31908549›Full record

ArticleOpen access journal of contraception2019

The Association of Public Insurance with Postpartum Contraception Preference and Provision.

Emily Verbus, Mustafa Ascha, Barbara Wilkinson, Mary Montague, Jane Morris, Brian M Mercer, Kavita Shah Arora

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open access journal of contraception, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emily VerbusSchool of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Mustafa AschaCleveland Institute for Computational Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4706-7379
Barbara WilkinsonSchool of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Mary MontagueSchool of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7420-5442
Jane MorrisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Brian M MercerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Kavita Shah AroraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9912-9466
Case Western Reserve University · USMetroHealth · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior studies have noted that public insurance status is associated with increased uptake of postpartum contraception whereas others have pointed to public insurance as a barrier to accessing highly effective forms of contraception.

objectiveTo assess differences in planned method and provision of postpartum contraception according to insurance type. STUDY

designThis is a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study examining postpartum women delivered at a single hospital in Cleveland, Ohio from 2012-2014. Contraceptive methods were analyzed according to Tier-based effectiveness as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The primary outcome was postpartum contraception method preference. Additional outcomes included method provision, postpartum visit attendance, and subsequent pregnancy within 365 days of delivery.

resultsOf the 8281 patients in the study cohort, 1372 (16.6%) were privately and 6990 (83.4%) were publicly insured. After adjusting for the potentially confounding clinical and demographic factors through propensity score analysis, public insurance was not associated with preference for a Tier 1 versus Tier 2 postpartum contraceptive method (matched adjusted odds ratio [maOR] 0.89, 95% CI 0.69-1.15), but was associated with a preference for Tier 1/2 vs Tier 3/None (maOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.17-1.69). There was no difference between women with private or public insurance in terms of method provision by 90 days after delivery (maOR 0.94, 95% CI 0.75-1.17). Public insurance status was also associated with decreased postpartum visit attendance (maOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.43-0.68) and increased rates of subsequent pregnancy within 365 days of delivery (maOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05-1.59).

conclusionPublic insurance status does not serve as a barrier to either the preference or provision of effective postpartum contraception. Women desiring highly- or moderately effective methods of contraception should have these methods provided prior to hospital discharge to minimize barriers to method provision.

Indexed as

disparitiesinsuranceLARCMedicaidpostpartum contraceptionsterilization

Identifiers

PMID31908549
PMCPMC6927572
OpenAlexW2994639532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.