ArticleMolecular vision2019
Long-term follow-up of retinal function and structure in
Article in Molecular vision, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Congenital Stationary Night Blindness (CSNB)-Case Reports and Review of Current Knowledge.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Temporal Regulation of Myopia and Inflammation-Associated Pathways in the Interphotoreceptor Retinoid-Binding Protein Knockout Mouse Model.Current eye research · 2025Article
- Article
- Contrast Sensitivity of ON and OFF Human Retinal Pathways in Myopia.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Whole-Exome Sequencing of 21 Families: Candidate Genes for Early-Onset High Myopia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Clinical and Genetic Characteristics of Korean Congenital Stationary Night Blindness Patients.Genes · 2021Article
- Novel biallelic TRPM1 variants in an elderly patient with complete congenital stationary night blindness.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Methods: Clinical examination included full-field electroretinography, axial length measurements, and multimodal retinal imaging. Molecular genetic tests included next-generation sequencing and Sanger sequencing. Results: All patients had non-recordable rod responses and electronegative configuration of the rod-cone responses at presentation. There was a median of 26% reduction in the dark- and light-adapted electroretinographic (ERG) amplitudes over 4 years. Myopia progressed rapidly in childhood but showed only a mild progression after the teenage years. Visual acuities were stable over time, and there was no sign of progressive retinal thinning. All patients had axial myopia. A novel homozygous c.1394T>A (p.Met465Lys) missense mutation in Conclusions: Further prospective study in larger samples is needed to establish whether there is progressive retinal degeneration in
Indexed as
Identifiers
31908403PMC6937218W3004200454What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.