Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31908399›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2019

CHOP is dispensable for lens transparency in wild-type and connexin50 mutant mice.

Peter J Minogue, Eric C Beyer, Viviana M Berthoud

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter J MinogueDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Eric C BeyerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Viviana M BerthoudDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
University of Chicago · US

Funding

BIOLOGY OF LENS INTERCELLULAR COMMUNICATIONR01EY008368 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BEYER, ERIC C · 1995 to 2018
$7.1M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY008368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: CCAAT/enhancer-binding homologous protein (CHOP), a transcription factor that has been implicated in differentiation, apoptosis, and autophagy, is greatly elevated in lenses with cataracts due to mutations of several different lens proteins. To test the possible role of CHOP in the cataractous lens, we studied the effect of knocking out Methods: Mouse lenses were examined by dark-field microscopy. Lens equatorial diameters and intensities of the opacities were quantified using ImageJ. Transcript levels were assessed by real-time quantitative PCR. Protein levels were determined by immunoblotting. Results: Homozygous Conclusions: The results show that CHOP is not required for lens transparency. They also suggest that CHOP is not the critical etiological factor for the cataracts observed in homozygous Cx50D47A lenses, further supporting a major role for connexins in the disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsCCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Protein-betaCell Cycle ProteinsConnexin 50ConnexinseIF-2 KinaseEndoplasmic Reticulum StressGene DeletionHomozygoteInsulin Receptor Substrate ProteinsLens, CrystallineMice, KnockoutMice, Mutant StrainsSignal TransductionSubcellular FractionsTranscription Factor CHOPCCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Protein-betaCebpb protein, mouseCell Cycle ProteinsConnexin 50ConnexinseIF-2 KinaseInsulin Receptor Substrate ProteinsIrs2 protein, mouseTranscription Factor CHOPTRB3 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID31908399
PMCPMC6925666
OpenAlexW2991665059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.