ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2019
Significance of postoperative follow-up of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer using circulating tumor DNA.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Whole Tumor Heterogeneity Topography (WTHT)-A New Approach for Assessment of Intratumor Mutational Heterogeneity in Colorectal Adenomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Cytokines at the Crossroads of Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Inflammation in Colorectal Cancer: Implications for Postoperative Complications.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Review
- Circulating tumor DNA for MRD detection in colorectal cancer: recent advances and clinical implications.Biomarker research · 2025Review
- Personalized surveillance in colorectal cancer: Integrating circulating tumor DNA and artificial intelligence into post-treatment follow-up.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Circulating tumor DNA as a biomarker of prognosis prediction in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2025Article
- Association of the immediate perioperative dynamics of circulating DNA levels and neutrophil extracellular traps formation in cancer patients.Precision clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Clinical impact of circulating tumor DNA to track minimal residual disease in colorectal cancer patients. Hopes and limitations.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Review
- The potential role of minimal/molecular residual disease in colorectal cancer: curative surgery, radiotherapy and beyond.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2023Review
- Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP)-Informed Personalized Molecular Residual Disease (MRD) Detection: An Exploratory Analysis from the PREDATOR Study of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Somatic Mutations in Exon 7 of theCancers · 2022Article
- Association of neutrophil extracellular traps with the production of circulating DNA in patients with colorectal cancer.iScience · 2022Article
- Circulating DNA in patients undergoing loco-regional treatment of colorectal cancer metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2022Review
- Detection and Quantification of ctDNA for Longitudinal Monitoring of Treatment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Using a Universal Mutant Detection Assay by Denaturing Capillary Electrophoresis.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2022Article
- Review
- The Liquid Biopsy for Lung Cancer: State of the Art, Limitations and Future Developments.Cancers · 2021Review
- Review
- Detection of Molecular Residual Disease Using Personalized Circulating Tumor DNA Assay in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Resection of Metastases.JCO precision oncology · 2021Article
- Review
- Clinical Perspectives on Liquid Biopsy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- Comprehensive analysis of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in zw10 kinetochore protein as a promising biomarker for screening and diagnosis of early colorectal cancer.Clinical and translational medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne of the most notable applications for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection in peripheral blood of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a long-term postoperative follow-up. Sometimes referred to as a "liquid (re)biopsy" it is a minimally invasive procedure and can be performed repeatedly at relatively short intervals (months or even weeks). The presence of the disease and the actual extent of the tumor burden (tumor mass) within the patient's body can be monitored. This is of particular importance, especially when evaluating radicality of surgical treatment as well as for early detection of disease progression or recurrence.
aimTo confirm the radicality of surgery using ctDNA and compare available methods for detection of recurrence in metastatic colorectal cancer.
methodsA total of 47 patients with detected ctDNA and indications for resection of mCRC were enrolled in the multicenter study involving three surgical centers. Standard postoperative follow-ups using imaging techniques and the determination of tumor markers were supplemented by ctDNA sampling. In addition to the baseline ctDNA testing prior to surgery, a postoperative observation was conducted by evaluating ctDNA presence up to a week after surgery and subsequently at approximately three-month intervals. The presence of ctDNA was correlated with radicality of surgical treatment and the actual clinical status of the patient.
resultsAmong the monitored patients, the R0 (curative) resection correlated with postoperative ctDNA negativity in 26 out of 28 cases of surgical procedures (26/28, 93%). In the remaining cases of R0 surgeries that displayed ctDNA, both patients were diagnosed with a recurrence of the disease after 6 months. In 7 patients who underwent an R1 resection, 4 ctDNA positivities (4/7, 57%) were detected after surgery and associated with the confirmation of early disease recurrence (after 3 to 7 months). All 15 patients (15/15, 100%) undergoing R2 resection remained constantly ctDNA positive during the entire follow-up period. In 22 cases of recurrence, ctDNA positivity was detected 22 times (22/22, 100%) compared to 16 positives (16/22, 73%) by imaging methods and 15 cases (15/22, 68%) of elevated tumor markers.
conclusionctDNA detection in patients with mCRC is a viable tool for early detection of disease recurrence as well as for confirmation of the radicality of surgical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.