Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31908346›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances2020

Cluster-mining: an approach for determining core structures of metallic nanoparticles from atomic pair distribution function data.

Soham Banerjee, Chia Hao Liu, Kirsten M Ø Jensen, Pavol Juhás, Jennifer D Lee, Marcus Tofanelli, Christopher J Ackerson, Christopher B Murray, Simon J L Billinge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Structure of a DNA-Stabilized AgAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ClusterFinder: a fast tool to find cluster structures from pair distribution function data.Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances · 2024
    Article
  9. Journal of applied crystallography · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Towards scanning nanostructure X-ray microscopy.Journal of applied crystallography · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Soham BanerjeeDepartment of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Chia Hao LiuDepartment of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Kirsten M Ø JensenDepartment of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark.
Pavol JuhásComputational Science Initiative, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA.
Jennifer D LeeDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Marcus TofanelliDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Christopher J AckersonDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Christopher B MurrayDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Simon J L BillingeDepartment of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9734-4998

Funding

National Science Foundation 1455099National Science Foundation DMREF-1534910U.S. Department of Energy DE-SC-00112704U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science DE-AC02-06CH11357U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science DE-SC0001004U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science DE-SC0012704Villum Fonden Villum Young Investigator
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel approach for finding and evaluating structural models of small metallic nanoparticles is presented. Rather than fitting a single model with many degrees of freedom, libraries of clusters from multiple structural motifs are built algorithmically and individually refined against experimental pair distribution functions. Each cluster fit is highly constrained. The approach, called cluster-mining, returns all candidate structure models that are consistent with the data as measured by a goodness of fit. It is highly automated, easy to use, and yields models that are more physically realistic and result in better agreement to the data than models based on cubic close-packed crystallographic cores, often reported in the literature for metallic nanoparticles.

Indexed as

clustersdata miningnanoparticlespair distribution functionsscreeningstructural models

Identifiers

PMID31908346
PMCPMC7045905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.