Observational studyCancer medicine2020
Evaluation of the diagnostic value of circulating tumor cells with CytoSorter
Observational study in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circulating Tumor Cell Detection for Therapeutic and Prognostic Roles in Breast Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical diagnostic biomarker "circulating tumor cells" in breast cancer - a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood as a diagnostic biomarker of breast cancer: A meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Salivary biomarkers in breast cancer diagnosis: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.Cancer medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Circulating tumor cells with chromosome 8 aneuploidy are a diagnostic and prognostic monitoring biomarker for ovarian cancer.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026Article
- The plasma nanoDSF denaturation profiles predict the presence of breast cancer.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Diagnosis and monitoring of breast cancer with a novel circulating tumor cells enrichment device.Biomarkers in medicine · 2025Article
- The development and applications of circulating tumour cells, circulating tumour DNA and other emerging biomarkers for early cancer detection.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025Review
- Impact of Nanomedicine in Women's Metastatic Breast Cancer.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024Review
- Identification of circulating tumor cells captured by the FDA-cleared ParsortixJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024Article
- Identification of novel membrane markers in circulating tumor cells of mesenchymal state in breast cancer.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2024Article
- Novel Isolating Approaches to Circulating Tumor Cell Enrichment Based on Microfluidics: A Review.Micromachines · 2024Review
- Cancer theragnostics: closing the loop for advanced personalized cancer treatment through the platform integration of therapeutics and diagnostics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Liquid Biopsy Instrument for Ultra-Fast and Label-Free Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Review
- Circulating Tumor Cells as a Promising Tool for Early Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cells · 2023Review
- Utilization of Circulating Tumor Cells in the Management of Solid Tumors.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Circulating tumor biomarkers in early-stage breast cancer: characteristics, detection, and clinical developments.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Factors influencing the diagnostic and prognostic values of circulating tumor cells in breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 8,935 patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Circulating Tumor Cells and Breast Cancer Metastasis: From Enumeration to Somatic Mutational Profile.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn this study, we aimed to investigate the viability of utilizing CytoSorter
methodsA total of 366 females patients suspected of having BC and 30 healthy female volunteers were enrolled in this study. CTCs were enriched by CytoSorter
resultsBased on the biopsy results, 130 BC patients at different cancer stages and 236 patients with BBD were enrolled in the study. Seven subjects were dropped out from the study. CTCs were detected in 109 of 128 BC patients, in one of 29 healthy volunteers, and in 37 of 232 patients with BBD. Maximum CTC counts detected in BC patients, healthy volunteers, and patients with BBD were 8, 1, and 4, respectively. Statistical analysis showed CTCs could be used to distinguish BC patients from healthy volunteers and patients with BBD (P < .0001). Circulating tumor cells were statistically associated with patients' cancer stage (P = .0126), tumor size (tumor node metastasis [TNM] T stage, P = .0253), cancer type (invasive vs noninvasive, P = .0141), and lymph node metastasis (P = .0436). More CTCs were found in patients at advanced cancer stage or TNM T stage and in patients with invasive tumor or lymph node metastasis. Furthermore, CTC detection rates in BC patients at Tis and T1-4 stages were 50%, 81.67%, 91.07%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. When the CTC cut-off value was set to 2, the ROC curve gave an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 with a specificity and sensitivity of 95.4% and 76.56%, respectively. Taken together, CTCs could be used as a diagnostic aid in assistance of cancer screening and staging.
conclusionCirculating tumor cells were successfully isolated in BC patients using CytoSorter
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.