Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31907864›Full record

SynthesisCerebellum (London, England)2020

Cerebral Cortical Activity Following Non-invasive Cerebellar Stimulation-a Systematic Review of Combined TMS and EEG Studies.

Lara Fernandez, Nigel C Rogasch, Michael Do, Gillian Clark, Brendan P Major, Wei-Peng Teo, Linda K Byrne, Peter G Enticott

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cerebellum (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cerebellar Functions Beyond Movement and Learning.Annual review of neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lara FernandezCognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia. lkornien@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5315-165X
Nigel C RogaschBrain and Mental Health Laboratory, School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia.
Michael DoCognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia.
Gillian ClarkCognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia.
Brendan P MajorCognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia.
Wei-Peng TeoPhysical Education and Sports Science (PESS) Academic Group, National Institute of Education (NIE), Nanyang Technological University, Nanyang Ave, Singapore, 637616, Singapore.
Linda K ByrneCognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia.
Peter G EnticottCognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council (AU) (FT160100077)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cerebellum sends dense projections to both motor and non-motor regions of the cerebral cortex via the cerebellarthalamocortical tract. The integrity of this tract is crucial for healthy motor and cognitive function. This systematic review examines research using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the cerebellum with combined cortical electroencephalography (EEG) to explore the temporal features of cerebellar-cortical connectivity. A detailed discussion of the outcomes and limitations of the studies meeting review criteria is presented. Databases were searched between 1 December 2017 and 6 December 2017, with Scopus alerts current as of 23 July 2019. Of the 407 studies initially identified, 10 met review criteria. Findings suggested that cerebellar-cortical assessment is suited to combined TMS and EEG, although work is required to ensure experimental procedures are optimal for eliciting a reliable cerebellar response from stimulation. A distinct variation in methodologies and outcome measures employed across studies, and small sample sizes limited the conclusions that could be drawn regarding the electrophysiological signatures of cerebellar-cortical communication. This review highlights the need for stringent protocols and methodologies for cerebellar-cortical assessments via combined TMS and EEG. With these in place, combined TMS and EEG will provide a valuable means for exploring cerebellar connectivity with a wide range of cortical sites. Assessments have the potential to aid in the understanding of motor and cognitive function in both healthy and clinical groups, and provide insights into long-range neural communication generally.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyTranscranial Magnetic StimulationCerebellumCerebral CortexHumansCerebellarthalamocortical tractCerebellumEEGNeural oscillationsNon-invasive brain stimulationTMSTMS-evoked potentials

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.