ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2021
Diagnostic performance of quantitative and qualitative parameters for the diagnosis of aortic graft infection using [
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evidence-based guideline of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) on imaging infection in vascular grafts.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Guideline
- Prosthetic vascular graft infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis on diagnostic accuracy of 18FDG PET/CT.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance and image interpretation ofJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Detection of aortic prosthetic graft infection withJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was the evaluation of quantitative and qualitative parameters for the diagnosis of aortic graft infection (AGI) using [
methodsPET/CT was performed in 50 patients with clinically suspected AGI. 12 oncological patients with aortic repair but without suspicion of AGI were included in the analysis to serve as control cohort. The [
results28 infected and 34 uninfected grafts were identified by standard of reference. SUV
conclusionQuantitative analysis by SUV
Indexed as
Identifiers
31907856What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.