ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2020
Evidence for different types of errors being associated with different types of post-error changes.
Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- New Insights Into Visual Word Recognition: Analyzing Error Distribution in Typical Readers.Journal of cognition · 2025Article
- Motor inhibition errors and interference suppression errors differ systematically on neural and behavioural features of response monitoring.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Midfrontal mechanisms of performance monitoring continuously adapt to incoming information during outcome anticipation.Neuroimage. Reports · 2023Article
- Larger error negativity peak amplitudes for accuracy versus speed instructions may reflect more neuro-cognitive alignment, not more intense error processing.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Age-related qualitative differences in post-error cognitive control adjustments.The British journal of developmental psychology · 2022Article
- Integrated responding improves prospective memory accuracy.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2022Article
- Post-error slowing: Large scale study in an online learning environment for practising mathematics and language.Developmental science · 2022Article
- How to measure post-error slowing: The case of pre-error speeding.Behavior research methods · 2022Article
- Post-error Slowing Reflects the Joint Impact of Adaptive and Maladaptive Processes During Decision Making.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- A direct and conceptual replication of post-loss speeding when gambling.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
- Clarifying the Role of Negative Emotions in the Origin and Control of Impulsive Actions.Psychologica Belgica · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Errors in simple choice tasks result in systematic changes in the response time and accuracy of subsequent trials. We propose that there are at least two different causes of choice errors - response speed and evidence quality, which result in different types of post-error changes. We explore these differences in types of errors and post-error changes in two recognition memory experiments with speed versus accuracy emphasis conditions that differentially produce response-speed and evidence-quality errors. Under conditions that give rise to more response-speed errors, we find evidence of traditional post-error slowing. Under conditions that give rise to evidence-quality errors, we find evidence of post-error speeding. We propose a broadening of theories of cognitive control to encompass maladaptive as well as adaptive strategies, and discuss implications for the use of post-error changes to measure cognitive control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31907850What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.