Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31907794›Full record

ReviewProtein & cell2020

Lifting the veil on the keratinocyte contribution to cutaneous nociception.

Matthieu Talagas, Nicolas Lebonvallet, François Berthod, Laurent Misery

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Protein & cell, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Skin innervation and itsFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review of sensory systems deployed by epidermal keratinocytes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthieu TalagasUniv Brest, LIEN, 29200, Brest, France. matthieu.talagas@chu-brest.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-6769-3364
Nicolas LebonvalletUniv Brest, LIEN, 29200, Brest, France.
François BerthodLaboratoire d'Organogenèse Expérimentale (LOEX), University of Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Laurent MiseryUniv Brest, LIEN, 29200, Brest, France.
Université de Bretagne Occidentale · FRUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cutaneous nociception is essential to prevent individuals from sustaining injuries. According to the conventional point of view, the responses to noxious stimuli are thought to be exclusively initiated by sensory neurons, whose activity would be at most modulated by keratinocytes. However recent studies have demonstrated that epidermal keratinocytes can also act as primary nociceptive transducers as a supplement to sensory neurons. To enlighten our understanding of cutaneous nociception, this review highlights recent and relevant findings on the cellular and molecular elements that underlie the contribution of epidermal keratinocytes as nociceptive modulators and noxious sensors, both under healthy and pathological conditions.

Indexed as

NociceptionAnimalsHumansKeratinocytesSensory Receptor CellsinflammationkeratinocytenociceptionpainskinTRP

Identifiers

PMID31907794
PMCPMC7093357
OpenAlexW3000007288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.