Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31907762›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2020

Low antimicrobial resistance in general practice patients in Rotterdam, the city with the largest proportion of immigrants in the Netherlands.

Maaike Honsbeek, Aimée Tjon-A-Tsien, Ellen Stobberingh, Jurriaan de Steenwinkel, Damian C Melles, Jan Lous, Jan Hendrik Richardus, Hélène Voeten

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Alterations in chromosomal genesMicrobial genomics · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Maaike HonsbeekMunicipal Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Schiedamsedijk 95, 3011 EN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5372-4526
Aimée Tjon-A-TsienMunicipal Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Schiedamsedijk 95, 3011 EN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ellen StobberinghDepartment of Medical Microbiology, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jurriaan de SteenwinkelDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Damian C MellesDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan LousMedical Laboratory for Primary Care, Star-SHL, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan Hendrik RichardusMunicipal Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Schiedamsedijk 95, 3011 EN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Hélène VoetenMunicipal Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Schiedamsedijk 95, 3011 EN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. hacm.voeten@rotterdam.nl.
Erasmus MC · NLGGD Rotterdam-Rijnmond · NLMaastricht University · NLStar Medisch Diagnostisch Centrum · NLUniversity of Applied Sciences Leiden · NL

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 023.010.001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an increasing problem. The prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in general practice patients is expected to be relatively high in Rotterdam, the Dutch city with the largest proportion non-Western immigrants. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant uropathogens (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis) in general practices in Rotterdam, and to find a possible association between the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli and age, gender, and socioeconomic status (SES). A retrospective analysis was performed of urine samples from general practice patients in 2016. The prevalence of AMR in uropathogens was compared with national resistance data, as was the prevalence of highly and multidrug resistant and extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae. Univariate logistic regression was used to study associations between antibiotic-resistant E. coli and age, gender, and SES area score. No clinically relevant differences were observed in the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant uropathogens in Rotterdam compared with the national prevalence. For E. coli and K. pneumoniae, the prevalence was 3.6% for ESBL production (both pathogens together), while the prevalence ranged between 4.2%-5.0% for high resistance and between 1.2%-3.3% for multidrug resistance. Ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli was significantly associated with higher age. Although Rotterdam has a high percentage of non-western immigrants and a low SES, AMR is low among general practice patients. This indicates that adherence to national guidelines in general practice enables maintenance of low AMR, even in high-risk populations.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacterial InfectionsCitiesEmigrants and ImmigrantsFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial resistanceGeneral practicePrevalence

Identifiers

PMID31907762
PMCPMC7182613
OpenAlexW2998008909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.