Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31907755›Full record

Trial reportPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2020

Bystander Program Effectiveness to Reduce Violence and Violence Acceptance Within Sexual Minority Male and Female High School Students Using a Cluster RCT.

Ann L Coker, Heather M Bush, Emily R Clear, Candace J Brancato, Heather L McCauley

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Polyvictimization Among Sexual and Gender Minority Youth.American journal of preventive medicine · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ann L CokerUniversity of Kentucky College of Medicine, 800 Rose St., Pavilion H, Room C361, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA. ann.coker@uky.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3417-0775
Heather M BushUniversity of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, USA.
Emily R ClearUniversity of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, USA.
Candace J BrancatoUniversity of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, USA.
Heather L McCauleyMichigan State University, School of Social Work, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
University of Kentucky · USMichigan State University · US

Funding

Green Dot across the Bluegrass: Evaluation of a primary prevention intervention tU01CE001675 · CE · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI COKER, ANN L · 2009 to 2013
$2.0M
NCIPC CDC HHS U01CE001675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bystander interventions have been highlighted as promising strategies to reduce sexual violence and sexual harassment, yet their effectiveness for sexual minority youth remains largely unexamined in high schools' populations. This rigorous cluster randomized control trial addresses this gap by evaluating intervention effectiveness among sexual majority and minority students known be to at increased risk of sexual violence. Kentucky high schools were randomized to intervention or control conditions. In intervention schools, educators provided school-wide Green Dot presentations (phase 1) and intensive bystander training to student popular opinion leaders (phase 2). Each spring from 2010 to 2014, students attending 26 high schools completed anonymous surveys about violence acceptance and violent events. An analytic sample of 74,836 surveys with no missing data over the 5 years was available. Sexual violence acceptance scores declined significantly over time in intervention versus control schools among all but sexual minority males. This intervention was also associated with reductions in both perpetration and victimization of sexual violence, sexual harassment, and physical dating violence among sexual majority yet not sexual minority youth. Both sexual minority and majority youth experienced reductions in stalking victimization and perpetration associated with the intervention. In this large cluster randomized controlled trial, the bystander intervention appears to work best to reduce violence for sexual majority youth. Bystander programs may benefit from explicitly engaging sexual minority youth in intervention efforts or adapting intervention programs to include attitudes that shape the experience of sexual minority high school youth (e.g., homophobic teasing, homonegativity).

Indexed as

Sexual and Gender MinoritiesAdolescentCluster AnalysisFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansKentuckyMaleProgram EvaluationSex OffensesSurveys and QuestionnairesViolenceBystander interventionSexual minorityViolence acceptance

Identifiers

PMID31907755
OpenAlexW3000053428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.